Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766835›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with observation/conservative management for preventing recurrent symptoms and complications in adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones (C-Gall trial).

Irfan Ahmed, Karen Innes, Miriam Brazzelli, Katie Gillies, Rumana Newlands, Alison Avenell, Rodolfo Hernández, Jane Blazeby, Bernard Croal, Jemma Hudson and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ASYMPTOMATIC CHOLELITHIASIS: EXPECTANT OR CHOLECYSTECTOMY. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Irfan AhmedDepartment of Surgery, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-4177
Karen InnesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK kareninnes@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8512-4368
Miriam BrazzelliHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7576-6751
Katie GilliesHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7890-2854
Rumana NewlandsHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-152X
Alison AvenellHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4813-5628
Rodolfo HernándezHealth Economics Research Unit (HERU), University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-8230
Jane BlazebyCentre for Surgical Research and NIHR Bristol and Weston Biomedical Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3354-3330
Bernard CroalClinical Biochemistry, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6375-3507
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-6419
Graeme MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-5646
Kirsty McCormackHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-1513
Alison McDonaldHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0256-2889
Peter MurchieAcademic Primary Care, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9968-5991
Craig RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4043-7349
University of Aberdeen · GBNHS Grampian · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU1Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGallstone disease (cholelithiasis) is common. In most people it is asymptomatic and does not require treatment, but in about 20% it can become symptomatic, causing pain and other complications requiring medical attention and/or surgery. A proportion of symptomatic people with uncomplicated gallstone disease do not experience further episodes of pain and, therefore, could be treated conservatively. Moreover, surgery carries risks of perioperative and postoperative complications. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: C-Gall is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation to assess whether cholecystectomy is cost-effective compared with observation/ conservative management (here after referred to as medical management) at 18 months post-randomisation (with internal pilot). PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) (36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) bodily pain domain) up to 18 months after randomisation.The primary economic outcome is incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained at 18 months. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Secondary outcome measures include condition-specific QoL, SF-36 domains, complications, further treatment, persistent symptoms, healthcare resource use, and costs assessed at 18 and 24 months after randomisation. The bodily pain domain of the SF-36 will also be assessed at 24 months after randomisation.A sample size of 430 participants was calculated. Computer-generated 1:1 randomisation was used.The C-Gall Study is currently in follow-up in 20 UK research centres. The first patient was randomised on 1 August 2016, with follow-up to be completed by 30 November 2021. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis of the primary outcome will be intention-to-treat and a per-protocol analysis. The primary outcome, area under the curve (AUC) for the SF-36 bodily pain up to 18 months, will be generated using the Trapezium rule and analysed using linear regression with adjustment for the minimisation variables (recruitment site, sex and age). For the secondary outcome, SF-36 bodily pain, AUC up to 24 months will be analysed in a similar way. Other secondary outcomes will be analysed using generalised linear models with adjustment for minimisation and baseline variables, as appropriate. Statistical significance will be at the two-sided 5% level with corresponding CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee approved this study (16/NS/0053). The dissemination plans include Health Technology Assessment monograph, international scientific meetings and publications in high-impact, open-access journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55215960; pre-results.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGallstonesAdultConservative TreatmentCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScotlandadult gastroenterologygastroenterologyprotocols & guidelinessurgery

Identifiers

PMID33766835
PMCPMC7996370
OpenAlexW3138196874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.