Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766719›Full record

ArticleUrology2022

Prevalence of Hyperprolactinemia and Clinically Apparent Prolactinomas in Men Undergoing Fertility Evaluation.

Siddhant S Ambulkar, Anne L Darves-Bornoz, Richard J Fantus, James Wren, Nelson E Bennett, Joshua A Halpern, Robert E Brannigan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siddhant S AmbulkarDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL. Electronic address: sid.ambulkar@northwestern.edu.
Anne L Darves-BornozDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Richard J FantusDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
James WrenDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Nelson E BennettDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Joshua A HalpernDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Robert E BranniganDepartment of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma among men presenting for initial fertility evaluation.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of men presenting for initial fertility evaluation at a tertiary care, academic health system between 1999 and 2018. Men with measured prolactin levels were analyzed to determine prevalence of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma. We compared clinical characteristics of men with and without hyperprolactinemia. Univariable and multivariable analysis were used to determine factors associated with hyperprolactinemia. We assessed effects of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma on testosterone levels, semen parameters and pregnancy outcomes after treatment.

resultsA total of 3101 men had serum prolactin level measured. 65 (2.1%) had hyperprolactinemia. Patients with hyperprolactinemia had lower testosterone (median 280 ng/dL vs 313 ng/dL, P = 0.038) and lower total motile sperm count (median 7.0 million vs 34.7 million, P = 0.001) compared to men without hyperprolactinemia. 43.1% of men with hyperprolactinemia had oligospermia vs 21.5% of men without hyperprolactinemia (P<0.001). Univariable analysis demonstrated that men with elevated luteinizing hormone (LH) (OR 1.077, P = 0.001) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (OR 1.032, P = 0.002) were more likely to have hyperprolactinemia. Men with oligospermia were more likely to have hyperprolactinemia (OR 2.334, P = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, neither hormone parameters nor oligospermia were associated with elevated prolactin (P>0.05). Of the 65 men with hyperprolactinemia, 11 (17%) were diagnosed with a prolactinoma, resulting in an overall prevalence of 11 in 3101 (0.35%).

conclusionThe overall prevalence of prolactinoma in our cohort of men undergoing fertility evaluation was 35-fold higher than the prevalence in the general male population.

Indexed as

HyperprolactinemiaInfertility, MaleProlactinomaSemen AnalysisAdultFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansLuteinizing HormoneMaleOligospermiaPrevalenceProlactinReproductive HealthRisk FactorsTestosteroneUnited StatesFollicle Stimulating HormoneLuteinizing HormoneProlactinTestosterone

Identifiers

PMID33766719
OpenAlexW3137264072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.