Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766677›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Effects of direct current stimulation on synaptic plasticity in a single neuron.

Forouzan Farahani, Greg Kronberg, Mohamad FallahRad, Hysell V Oviedo, Lucas C Parra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational Optimization of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Horn Interneuron Polarization.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Repeated tDCS at Clinically Relevant Field Intensity Can Boost Concurrent Motor Learning in Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Forouzan FarahaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: forouzan.v.farahani@gmail.com.
Greg KronbergDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Mohamad FallahRadDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Hysell V OviedoBiology Department, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA; CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lucas C ParraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA.
City College of New York · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Effects of direct-current stimulation on synaptic plasticityR01NS095123 · NINDS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (DCS) has lasting effects that may be explained by a boost in synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP). We hypothesized that this boost is the result of a modulation of somatic spiking in the postsynaptic neuron, as opposed to indirect network effects. To test this directly we record somatic spiking in a postsynaptic neuron during LTP induction with concurrent DCS.

methodsWe performed rodent in-vitro patch-clamp recordings at the soma of individual CA1 pyramidal neurons. LTP was induced with theta-burst stimulation (TBS) applied concurrently with DCS. To test the causal role of somatic polarization, we manipulated polarization via current injections. We also used a computational multi-compartment neuron model that captures the effect of electric fields on membrane polarization and activity-dependent synaptic plasticity.

resultsTBS-induced LTP was enhanced when paired with anodal DCS as well as depolarizing current injections. In both cases, somatic spiking during the TBS was increased, suggesting that evoked somatic activity is the primary factor affecting LTP modulation. However, the boost of LTP with DCS was less than expected given the increase in spiking activity alone. In some cells, we also observed DCS-induced spiking, suggesting DCS also modulates LTP via induced network activity. The computational model reproduces these results and suggests that they are driven by both direct changes in postsynaptic spiking and indirect changes due to network activity.

conclusionDCS enhances synaptic plasticity by increasing postsynaptic somatic spiking, but we also find that an increase in network activity may boost but also limit this enhancement.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationElectric StimulationHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsPyramidal CellsSynapsesLong-term potentiationLTPSynaptic, plasticitytDCSTranscranial direct current stimulationTranscranial electric stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33766677
PMCPMC8165013
OpenAlexW3137657347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.