ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Children with developmental language disorder: a frequency following response in the noise study.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Association between auditory processing and behavioral problems in preschool children with developmental language disorder].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2026Article
- Auditory Electrophysiological Findings in Children with Developmental Language Disorder: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exploring the relationship between auditory processing characteristics and cognition in preschool children with developmental language disorder based on fNIRS.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Effect of Lateralization, Age, and Sex on Frequency Following Response in Children: Neural Speech Encoding to a 170 ms [da] Stimulus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Spectral and Temporal Auditory Processing Skills in Children with a History of Speech and Language Delay.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Article
- Atypical Sensory Processing in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Clinical Phenotypes in Preschool-Aged Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChildren with developmental language disorder have been reported to have poor temporal auditory processing. This study aimed to examine the frequency following response.
objectiveThis work aimed to investigate speech processing in quiet and in noise.
methodsTwo groups of children were included in this work: the control group (15 children with normal language development) and the study group (25 children diagnosed with developmental language disorder). All children were submitted to intelligence scale, language assessment, full audiological evaluation, and frequency following response in quiet and noise (+5QNR and +10QNR).
resultsResults showed no statically significant difference between both groups as regards IQ or PTA. In the study group, the advanced analysis of frequency following response showed reduced F0 and F2 amplitudes. Results also showed that noise has an impact on both the transient and sustained components of the frequency following response in the same group.
conclusionChildren with developmental language disorder have difficulty in speech processing especially in the presence of background noise. Frequency following response is an efficient procedure that can be used to address speech processing problems in children with developmental language disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.