Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766183›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

'Spending all this time stressing and worrying and calculating': marginal food security and student life at a Diverse Urban University.

Ryan J Gamba, Michael T Schmeltz, Nancy Ortiz, Alina Engelman, Juleen Lam, Adianez Ampil, Maria M Pritchard, Joshua Kier Adrian Santillan, Esteban S Rivera, Lana Mariko Wood and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan J GambaDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7385-2509
Michael T SchmeltzDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4764-9723
Nancy OrtizDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Alina EngelmanDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-7121
Juleen LamDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Adianez AmpilUniversity of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Maria M PritchardDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Joshua Kier Adrian SantillanDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Esteban S RiveraDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Lana Mariko WoodDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4379-7705
Darice IngramPioneer for H.O.P.E, California State University, Hayward, CA, USA.
Kate CheyneAlameda County Community Food Bank, Oakland, CA, USA.
Sarah TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd, Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
California State University, East Bay · USAlameda County Community Food Bank · USPioneer (United States) · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFood security status is a continuum ranging from high to very low food security. While marginal food security falls next to high food security on the spectrum, new quantitative research indicates marginal food security status is associated with negative health outcomes and poor academic performance among college students. Qualitative research focusing on college students experiencing marginal food security has not been conducted. The current study aims to qualitatively explore experiences of college students with marginal food security and to identify themes to better understand and provide context regarding how marginal food security impacts students.

designStudents were recruited for semi-structured interviews with questions designed to study the challenges associated with students' food situations. All interviews were recorded and transcribed with themes identified via an inductive approach.

settingA large public university on the US west coast.

participantsThirty college students.

resultsKey themes that emerged: purchasing cheap unhealthy foods, insufficient time to prepare and eat meals on a regular basis, stress and anxiety around the inability to eat healthy food and future health issues, self-perception of health when eating poorly along with physical symptoms and low academic motivation by not fully participating in their courses due to few healthy food options or missing meals.

conclusionMarginal food security can potentially diminish students' health and their capacity to learn and succeed in their coursework. The results emphasise that students experiencing marginal food security should not be grouped with students experiencing high food security.

Indexed as

Food SecurityUniversitiesAnxietyFood SupplyHumansStudentsAcademic outcomesCollege studentsMarginal food security

Identifiers

PMID33766183
PMCPMC9884784
OpenAlexW3137699276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.