Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766108›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2021

Metagenomic insights into the taxonomy, function, and dysbiosis of prokaryotic communities in octocorals.

T Keller-Costa, A Lago-Lestón, J P Saraiva, R Toscan, S G Silva, J Gonçalves, C J Cox, N Kyrpides, U Nunes da Rocha, R Costa

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Genome sequence of the marine bacteriumMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genome sequence of the marine alphaproteobacteriumMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mitigation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

T Keller-CostaInstituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal. tinakellercosta@tecnico.ulisboa.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-3702-9192
A Lago-LestónDivisión de Biología Experimental y Aplicada (DBEA), Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE), Carr. Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Zona Playitas, C.P 22860, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. alago@cicese.mx.
J P SaraivaHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, 04318, Germany.
R ToscanHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, 04318, Germany.
S G SilvaInstituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal.
J GonçalvesCentro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
C J CoxCentro de Ciências do Mar (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, 8005-139, Faro, Portugal.
N KyrpidesDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
U Nunes da RochaHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, 04318, Germany.
R CostaInstituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências (iBB), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001, Lisbon, Portugal.
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DEUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Algarve · PTCentro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada · MXJoint Genome Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn octocorals (Cnidaria Octocorallia), the functional relationship between host health and its symbiotic consortium has yet to be determined. Here, we employed comparative metagenomics to uncover the distinct functional and phylogenetic features of the microbiomes of healthy Eunicella gazella, Eunicella verrucosa, and Leptogorgia sarmentosa tissues, in contrast with the microbiomes found in seawater and sediments. We further explored how the octocoral microbiome shifts to a pathobiome state in E. gazella.

resultsMultivariate analyses based on 16S rRNA genes, Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COGs), Protein families (Pfams), and secondary metabolite-biosynthetic gene clusters annotated from 20 Illumina-sequenced metagenomes each revealed separate clustering of the prokaryotic communities of healthy tissue samples of the three octocoral species from those of necrotic E. gazella tissue and surrounding environments. While the healthy octocoral microbiome was distinguished by so-far uncultivated Endozoicomonadaceae, Oceanospirillales, and Alteromonadales phylotypes in all host species, a pronounced increase of Flavobacteriaceae and Alphaproteobacteria, originating from seawater, was observed in necrotic E. gazella tissue. Increased abundances of eukaryotic-like proteins, exonucleases, restriction endonucleases, CRISPR/Cas proteins, and genes encoding for heat-shock proteins, inorganic ion transport, and iron storage distinguished the prokaryotic communities of healthy octocoral tissue regardless of the host species. An increase of arginase and nitric oxide reductase genes, observed in necrotic E. gazella tissues, suggests the existence of a mechanism for suppression of nitrite oxide production by which octocoral pathogens may overcome the host's immune system.

conclusionsThis is the first study to employ primer-less, shotgun metagenome sequencing to unveil the taxonomic, functional, and secondary metabolism features of prokaryotic communities in octocorals. Our analyses reveal that the octocoral microbiome is distinct from those of the environmental surroundings, is host genus (but not species) specific, and undergoes large, complex structural changes in the transition to the dysbiotic state. Host-symbiont recognition, abiotic-stress response, micronutrient acquisition, and an antiviral defense arsenal comprising multiple restriction endonucleases, CRISPR/Cas systems, and phage lysogenization regulators are signatures of prokaryotic communities in octocorals. We argue that these features collectively contribute to the stabilization of symbiosis in the octocoral holobiont and constitute beneficial traits that can guide future studies on coral reef conservation and microbiome therapy. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsMetagenomicsPhylogenyAnimalsAnthozoaBacteriaDysbiosisMetagenomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SEunicellaGorgoniansHolobiontHost-microbe interactionsLeptogorgiaNecrosisSecondary metabolismSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33766108
PMCPMC7993494
OpenAlexW3137955457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.