ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2021
Early-onset sepsis risk calculator: a review of its effectiveness and comparative study with our evidence-based local guidelines.
Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of Perinatal Antibiotic Stewardship - where we are, where to go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Pooled it
- Reducing unnecessary antibiotic exposure among neonates evaluated for suspected early-onset sepsis through an adapted risk-stratification and antimicrobial stewardship pathway in northwest Ethiopia: a prospective quality improvement study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- A comparison between early onset sepsis (EOS) risk calculator and modified new protocol in a newborn ≥ 35 weeks: a simulation study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Predictors, aetiology and outcome of early-onset neonatal bloodstream infection: a case-control study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa.Journal of tropical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Diagnostic Prediction Model for Neonatal Sepsis in a Low-Resource Setting, Ethiopia.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Assessment of Culture-Negative Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis: Risk Factors and Utility of Currently Used Serum Biomarkers.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Implementation of an EOS calculator-based protocol decreased infant antibiotic exposure in chorioamnionitis without correlation with placental histopathology.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Observational
- Article
- Sustaining the Continued Effectiveness of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in Preterm Infants.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Article
- The Management of Neonates ≥34 Weeks' Gestation at Risk of Early Onset Sepsis: A Pilot Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The impact of early empirical antibiotics treatment on clinical outcome of very preterm infants: a nationwide multicentre study in China.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- New insights in pediatrics in 2021: choices in allergy and immunology, critical care, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, haematology, infectious diseases, neonatology, neurology, nutrition, palliative care, respiratory tract illnesses and telemedicine.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2022Review
- Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis (EOS) Calculator plus Universal Serial Physical Examination (SPE): A Prospective Two-Step Implementation of a Neonatal EOS Prevention Protocol for Reduction of Sepsis Workup and Antibiotic Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Procalcitonin in Pediatric Sepsis: What Is It Good for?Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccording to most early-onset sepsis (EOS) management guidelines, approximately 10% of the total neonatal population are exposed to antibiotics in the first postnatal days with subsequent increase of neonatal and pediatric comorbidities. A review of literature demonstrates the effectiveness of EOS calculator in reducing antibiotic overtreatment and NICU admission among neonates ≥34 weeks' gestational age (GA); however, some missed cases of culture-positive EOS have also been described.
methodsSingle-center retrospective study from 1st January 2018 to 31st December 2018 conducted in the Division of Neonatology at Santa Chiara Hospital (Pisa, Italy). Neonates ≥34 weeks' GA with birth weight ≤ 1500 g, 34-36 weeks' GA neonates with suspected intraamniotic infection and neonates ≥34 weeks' GA with three clinical signs of EOS or two signs and one risk factor for EOS receive empirical antibiotics. Neonates ≥34 weeks' GA with risk factors for EOS or with one clinical indicator of EOS undergo serial measurements of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the first 48-72 h of life; they receive empirical antibiotics in case of abnormalities at blood exams with one or more clinical signs of EOS. Two hundred sixty-five patients at risk for EOS met inclusion criteria; they were divided into 3 study groups: 34-36 weeks' GA newborns (n = 95, group A), ≥ 37 weeks' GA newborns (n = 170, group B), and ≥ 34 weeks' GA newborns (n = 265, group A + B). For each group, we compared the number of patients for which antibiotics would have been needed, based on EOS calculator, and the number of the same patients we treated with antibiotics during the study period. Comparisons between the groups were performed using McNemar's test and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05; post-hoc power analysis was carried out to evaluate the sample sizes.
results32/265 (12.1%) neonates ≥34 weeks' GA received antibiotics within the first 12 h of life. According to EOS calculator 55/265 (20.7%) patients would have received antibiotics with EOS incidence 2/1000 live births (p < 0.0001).
conclusionOur evidence-based protocol entails a further decrease of antibiotic overtreatment compared to EOS calculator. No negative consequences for patients were observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.