Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021
Respectful maternal and newborn care: measurement in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Nepal.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mothers' Experiences of Respectful Maternity Care During Labor: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study at the KNUST Hospital.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
- Assessing the Generalizability of Client Experience Measurement Tools in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Global health, science and practice · 2025Review
- Nothing About Us Without Us: Consolidating Experiences of Maternity Care to Advance Equity.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- Women with disabilities' experiences with respectful maternity care in Nepal: a phenomenological study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Measuring respectful maternal and newborn care in Nepal: Comparing linked observation and interview data- prospective cohort study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Does mistreatment during institutional childbirth increase the likelihood of experiencing postpartum depressive symptoms? A prospective cohort study in Nepal.Global health action · 2024Article
- Respectful Maternity Care during labour and postpartum in a tertiary hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the code of ethics for midwives in Iran.BMC medical ethics · 2023Review
- Level and correlates of disrespect and abuse among newborns in selected public hospitals of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Measuring experience of and satisfaction with newborn care: a scoping review of tools and measures.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Women's perceptions of telephone interviews about their experiences with childbirth care in Nigeria: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?Reproductive health · 2022Article
- Women's report of mistreatment during facility-based childbirth: validity and reliability of community survey measures.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Count every newborn: EN-BIRTH study improving facility-based coverage and quality measurement in routine information systems.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Mistreatment of newborns after childbirth in health facilities in Nepal: Results from a prospective cohort observational study.PloS one · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRespectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.
methodsAt one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017-July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health - ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth - as possible predictors for reporting poor care.
resultsAmong 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = - 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = - 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.
conclusionsMeasurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women's age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.