Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765971›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

Respectful maternal and newborn care: measurement in one EN-BIRTH study hospital in Nepal.

Rejina Gurung, Harriet Ruysen, Avinash K Sunny, Louise T Day, Loveday Penn-Kekana, Mats Målqvist, Binda Ghimire, Dela Singh, Omkar Basnet, Srijana Sharma and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nothing About Us Without Us: Consolidating Experiences of Maternity Care to Advance Equity.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perceptions of Good-Quality Antenatal Care and Birthing Services among Postpartum Women in Nepal.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rejina Gurung *Research Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Harriet Ruysen *Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Avinash K SunnyResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Louise T DayCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Loveday Penn-KekanaCentre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mats MålqvistDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, Uppsala, Sweden.
Binda GhimireMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dela SinghMinistry of Health and Population, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Omkar BasnetResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Srijana SharmaResearch Division, Golden Community, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Theresa ShaverUSAID (contractor), Washington, DC, USA.
Allisyn C MoranDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joy E Lawn *Centre for Maternal, Adolescent, Reproductive & Child Health (MARCH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ashish Kc *Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 14B, Uppsala, Sweden. ashish.k.c@kbh.uu.se.
EN-BIRTH Study Group
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUppsala University · SENepal Development Research Institute · NPUnited States Agency for International Development · USMinistry of Health and Population · NP

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespectful maternal and newborn care (RMNC) is an important component of high-quality care but progress is impeded by critical measurement gaps for women and newborns. The Every Newborn Birth Indicators Research Tracking in Hospitals (EN-BIRTH) study was an observational study with mixed methods assessing measurement validity for coverage and quality of maternal and newborn indicators. This paper reports results regarding the measurement of respectful care for women and newborns.

methodsAt one EN-BIRTH study site in Pokhara, Nepal, we included additional questions during exit-survey interviews with women about their experiences (July 2017-July 2018). The questionnaire was based on seven mistreatment typologies: Physical; Sexual; or Verbal abuse; Stigma/discrimination; Failure to meet professional standards of care; Poor rapport between women and providers; and Health care denied due to inability to pay. We calculated associations between these typologies and potential determinants of health - ethnicity, age, sex, mode of birth - as possible predictors for reporting poor care.

resultsAmong 4296 women interviewed, none reported physical, sexual, or verbal abuse. 15.7% of women were dissatisfied with privacy, and 13.0% of women reported their birth experience did not meet their religious and cultural needs. In descriptive analysis, adjusted odds ratios and multivariate analysis showed primiparous women were less likely to report respectful care (β = 0.23, p-value < 0.0001). Women from Madeshi (a disadvantaged ethnic group) were more likely to report poor care (β = - 0.34; p-value 0.037) than women identifying as Chettri/Brahmin. Women who had caesarean section were less likely to report poor care during childbirth (β = - 0.42; p-value < 0.0001) than women with a vaginal birth. However, babies born by caesarean had a 98% decrease in the odds (aOR = 0.02, 95% CI, 0.01-0.05) of receiving skin-to-skin contact than those with vaginal births.

conclusionsMeasurement of respectful care at exit interview after hospital birth is challenging, and women generally reported 100% respectful care for themselves and their baby. Specific questions, with stratification by mode of birth, women's age and ethnicity, are important to identify those mistreated during care and to prioritise action. More research is needed to develop evidence-based measures to track experience of care, including zero separation for the mother-newborn pair, and to improve monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalsHumansInfant, NewbornNepalPerinatal CarePregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchQuality Indicators, Health CareRespectSocial Determinants of HealthSocial StigmaCoverageDeliveryMaternalMistreatmentNepalNewbornPrivacyRespectRespectful maternal and newborn careStandard of care

Identifiers

PMID33765971
PMCPMC7995692
OpenAlexW3138298404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.