Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765790›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

Access to semantic cues does not lead to perceptual restoration of interrupted speech in cochlear-implant users.

Brittany N Jaekel, Sarah Weinstein, Rochelle S Newman, Matthew J Goupell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brittany N JaekelDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID s000000016118530X
Sarah WeinsteinDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
Rochelle S NewmanDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID s0000000216264241
Matthew J GoupellDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.ORCID s0000000326623057
University of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

COMPARATIVE AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY OF HEARINGT32DC000046 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI Catherine Emily Carr, Matthew J. Goupell · 1994 to 2026
$7.5M
Binaural unmasking of tones and speech in bilateral cochlear implanteesR01DC014948 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GOUPELL, MATTHEW J. · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
Effects of interrupting noise and speech repair mechanisms in child and adult cochlear-implant usersF31DC017362 · NIDCD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI JAEKEL, BRITTANY · 2018 to 2019
$66k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017362NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014948NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cochlear-implant (CI) users experience less success in understanding speech in noisy, real-world listening environments than normal-hearing (NH) listeners. Perceptual restoration is one method NH listeners use to repair noise-interrupted speech. Whereas previous work has reported that CI users can use perceptual restoration in certain cases, they failed to do so under listening conditions in which NH listeners can successfully restore. Providing increased opportunities to use top-down linguistic knowledge is one possible method to increase perceptual restoration use in CI users. This work tested perceptual restoration abilities in 18 CI users and varied whether a semantic cue (presented visually) was available prior to the target sentence (presented auditorily). Results showed that whereas access to a semantic cue generally improved performance with interrupted speech, CI users failed to perceptually restore speech regardless of the semantic cue availability. The lack of restoration in this population directly contradicts previous work in this field and raises questions of whether restoration is possible in CI users. One reason for speech-in-noise understanding difficulty in CI users could be that they are unable to use tools like restoration to process noise-interrupted speech effectively.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionCuesSemanticsSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID33765790
PMCPMC7935498
OpenAlexW3135311174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.