Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765456›Full record

SynthesisThe Lancet. Public health2021

Community-based active case-finding interventions for tuberculosis: a systematic review.

Rachael M Burke, Marriott Nliwasa, Helena R A Feasey, Lelia H Chaisson, Jonathan E Golub, Fahd Naufal, Adrienne E Shapiro, Maria Ruperez, Lily Telisinghe, Helen Ayles and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Lancet. Public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Number needed to screen for TB in clinical, structural or occupational risk groups.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein and Computer-Aided Analysis of Chest X-rays as Tuberculosis Triage Tests at Health Facilities in Lesotho and South Africa.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Reimagining tuberculosis detection in Somalia: from passive to active case finding.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Public transport: the missing link in tuberculosis control in Somalia.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic epidemiology ofMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Rachael M BurkeClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. Electronic address: rachael.burke@lshtm.ac.uk.
Marriott NliwasaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Helse Nord Tuberculosis Initiative, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Helena R A FeaseyClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lelia H ChaissonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jonathan E GolubCenter for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Fahd NaufalCenter for Tuberculosis Research, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Adrienne E ShapiroDepartment of Global Health and Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Maria RuperezClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Lily TelisingheClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Zambart, University of Zambia School of Public Health, Ridgeway, Zambia.
Helen AylesClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Zambart, University of Zambia School of Public Health, Ridgeway, Zambia.
Elizabeth L CorbettClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Peter MacPhersonClinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi; Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBJohns Hopkins University · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme · MWUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Zambia · ZM

Funding

Novel clinic-based TB diagnostics and testing algorithms for persons with HIVK23AI140918 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHAPIRO, ADRIENNE E · 2019 to 2024
$937k
Medical Research Council MR/N020618/1NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI140918Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206575/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based active case-finding interventions might identify and treat more people with tuberculosis disease than standard case detection. We aimed to assess whether active case-finding interventions can affect tuberculosis epidemiology in the wider community.

methodsWe did a systematic review by searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for studies that compared tuberculosis case notification rates, tuberculosis disease prevalence, or tuberculosis infection prevalence or incidence in children, between populations exposed and unexposed to active case-finding interventions. We included studies published in English between Jan 1, 1980, and April 13, 2020. Studies of active case-finding in the general population, in populations perceived to be at high risk for tuberculosis, and in closed settings were included, whereas studies of tuberculosis screening at health-care facilities, among household contacts, or among children only, and studies that screened fewer than 1000 people were excluded. To estimate effectiveness, we extracted or calculated case notification rates, prevalence of tuberculosis disease, and incidence or prevalence of tuberculosis infection in children, and compared ratios of these outcomes between groups that were exposed or not exposed to active case-finding interventions.

results27 883 abstracts were screened and 988 articles underwent full text review. 28 studies contributed data for analysis of tuberculosis case notifications, nine for prevalence of tuberculosis disease, and two for incidence or prevalence of tuberculosis infection in children. In one cluster-randomised trial in South Africa and Zambia, an active case-finding intervention based on community mobilisation and sputum drop-off did not affect tuberculosis prevalence, whereas, in a cluster-randomised trial in Vietnam, an active case-finding intervention based on sputum tuberculosis tests for everyone reduced tuberculosis prevalence in the community. We found inconsistent, low-quality evidence that active case-finding might increase the number of cases of tuberculosis notified in populations with structural risk factors for tuberculosis.

interpretationCommunity-based active case-finding for tuberculosis might be effective in changing tuberculosis epidemiology and thereby improving population health if delivered with high coverage and intensity. If possible, active case-finding projects should incorporate a well designed, robust evaluation to contribute to the evidence base and help elucidate which delivery methods and diagnostic strategies are most effective.

fundingWHO Global TB Programme.

Indexed as

Community Health ServicesHumansMass ScreeningRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33765456
PMCPMC8082281
OpenAlexW3137757024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.