ArticleHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2021
Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pemigatinib for Unresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor-2 Rearrangement: Results From the Phase III FIGHT-302 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026Trial
- Long-term outcomes in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Trial
- Pemigatinib in previously treated Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma carrying FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: A phase II study.Cancer medicine · 2023Trial
- Impaired Chromatin Remodeling Predicts Better Survival to Modified Gemcitabine and S-1 plus Nivolumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Phase II T1219 Study.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- Assessment of MRD and Longitudinal Monitoring of Post-Surgery Biliary Tract Cancer With a Customized ctDNA Panel.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Understanding cholangiocarcinoma: molecular landscape, pathological classification, and challenges in biopsy diagnosis.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Combining Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) and Systemic Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Cancers · 2026Article
- Molecular and Clinical Determinants of Targeted Therapy Treatment in Biliary Tract Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Global patterns of mutational profiles in biliary tract cancer.Journal of hepatology · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Prognostic Impact of IDH Mutations in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating multi-omic signature of disease severity and cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis.Hepatology communications · 2026Article
- Effectiveness and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus lenvatinib with or without Gemox chemotherapy in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Eligibility for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Genomic Profiles of Patients With Biliary Tract Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Perioperative approaches for patients with biliary tract cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Utility of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Microarray in Evaluating Pancreaticobiliary Brushing Specimens in Conjunction with Conventional Cytology.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2026Article
- Genomic landscape of cholangiocarcinoma in India: ethnic variants and implications for targeted therapy.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Association of IDH1 mutations with survival and recurrence in resected intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma received or not received adjuvant chemotherapy.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Outcomes of First Versus Second-Line Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of Metastatic Sites in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer Treated with Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and Durvalumab.Targeted oncology · 2026Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimGenetic alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are increasingly well characterized, but their impact on outcome and prognosis remains unknown. APPROACH AND
resultsThis bi-institutional study of patients with confirmed iCCA (n = 412) used targeted next-generation sequencing of primary tumors to define associations among genetic alterations, clinicopathological variables, and outcome. The most common oncogenic alterations were isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1; 20%), AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (20%), tumor protein P53 (TP53; 17%), cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A; 15%), breast cancer 1-associated protein 1 (15%), FGFR2 (15%), polybromo 1 (12%), and KRAS (10%). IDH1/2 mutations (mut) were mutually exclusive with FGFR2 fusions, but neither was associated with outcome. For all patients, TP53 (P < 0.0001), KRAS (P = 0.0001), and CDKN2A (P < 0.0001) alterations predicted worse overall survival (OS). These high-risk alterations were enriched in advanced disease but adversely impacted survival across all stages, even when controlling for known correlates of outcome (multifocal disease, lymph node involvement, bile duct type, periductal infiltration). In resected patients (n = 209), TP53mut (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.08-3.06; P = 0.03) and CDKN2A deletions (del; HR, 3.40; 95% CI, 1.95-5.94; P < 0.001) independently predicted shorter OS, as did high-risk clinical variables (multifocal liver disease [P < 0.001]; regional lymph node metastases [P < 0.001]), whereas KRASmut (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.97-2.93; P = 0.06) trended toward statistical significance. The presence of both or neither high-risk clinical or genetic factors represented outcome extremes (median OS, 18.3 vs. 74.2 months; P < 0.001), with high-risk genetic alterations alone (median OS, 38.6 months; 95% CI, 28.8-73.5) or high-risk clinical variables alone (median OS, 37.0 months; 95% CI, 27.6-not available) associated with intermediate outcome. TP53mut, KRASmut, and CDKN2Adel similarly predicted worse outcome in patients with unresectable iCCA. CDKN2Adel tumors with high-risk clinical features were notable for limited survival and no benefit of resection over chemotherapy.
conclusionsTP53, KRAS, and CDKN2A alterations were independent prognostic factors in iCCA when controlling for clinical and pathologic variables, disease stage, and treatment. Because genetic profiling can be integrated into pretreatment therapeutic decision-making, combining clinical variables with targeted tumor sequencing may identify patient subgroups with poor outcome irrespective of treatment strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.