ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Quantitative Comparisons of Translation Activity by Ribosome Profiling with Internal Standards.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in ribosome profiling technologies.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025Review
- Calibrated ribosome profiling assesses the dynamics of ribosomal flux on transcripts.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Transcriptome-wide profiling of acute stress induced changes in ribosome occupancy level using external standards.PloS one · 2023Article
- Normalized Ribo-Seq for Quantifying Absolute Global and Specific Changes in Translation.Bio-protocol · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ribosome profiling is a genome-wide approach to map the positions of ribosomes on messenger RNAs. The abundance of ribosome-protected fragments can be used within condition to compare relative translation activities between different transcripts and between distinct conditions for the same transcript. A unified and routine method is currently lacking, however, to normalize between conditions for differences in global translation levels. Here we describe experimental and computational methods to use an orthogonal species spike-in, or internal standard, to enable absolute comparisons of translation activity between conditions. This simple modification of standard ribosome profiling provides a robust approach for accurately interpreting the effects of diverse genetic, chemical, and environmental perturbations of translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33765273What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.