Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765253›Full record

ReviewThe protein journal2021

The Formation of Native Disulfide Bonds: Treading a Fine Line in Protein Folding.

Mahesh Narayan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The protein journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Folds from fold: Exploring topological isoforms of a single-domain protein.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Regulation of P-Glycoprotein during Oxidative Stress.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetically Engineered Cellular Membrane Vesicles as Tailorable Shells for Therapeutics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mahesh NarayanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP), 500 W. University Ave., El Paso, TX, 79968, USA. mnarayan@utep.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2194-5228
The University of Texas at El Paso · US

Funding

Understanding PDI-related neurotoxicity and advancing preventative approachesSC3GM111200 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS EL PASO · PI NARAYAN, MAHESH · 2016 to 2019
$453k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1SC3 GM111200 01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The folding of proteins that contain disulfide bonds is termed oxidative protein folding. It involves a chemical reaction resulting in the formation of disulfide bonds and a physical conformational folding reaction that promotes the formation of the native structure. While the presence of disulfide bonds significantly increases the complexity of the folding landscape, it is generally recognized that native disulfide bonds help funnel the trajectory towards the final folded form. Here, we review the role of disulfide bonds in oxidative protein folding and argue that even structure-inducing native disulfide bond formation treads a fine line in the regeneration of disulfide-bond-containing proteins. The translation of this observation to protein misfolding related disorders is discussed.

Indexed as

DisulfidesProtein FoldingProteinsAnimalsHumansOxidation-ReductionProtein ConformationProteostasis DeficienciesDisulfidesProteinsConformational foldingDisulfide bondsNative-like structureOxidative protein foldingProtein misfolding related disordersThiol-disulfide exchange reactions

Identifiers

PMID33765253
OpenAlexW3136697548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.