Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765248›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2021

Can activated long-term memory maintain serial order information?

Benjamin Kowialiewski, Benoît Lemaire, Steve Majerus, Sophie Portrat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin KowialiewskiDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmühlestrasse 14, 8050, Zürich, Switzerland. benjamin.kowialiewski@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-761X
Benoît LemaireUniversity of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Steve MajerusUniversity of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Sophie PortratFund for Scientific Research - F.R.S.-FNRS, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-17-CE28-0013-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The maintenance of serial order information is a core component of working memory (WM). Many theoretical models assume the existence of specific serial order mechanisms. Those are considered to be independent from the linguistic system supporting maintenance of item information. This is based on studies showing that psycholinguistic factors strongly affect the ability to maintain item information, while leaving order recall relatively unaffected. Recent language-based accounts suggest, however, that the linguistic system could provide mechanisms that are sufficient for serial order maintenance. A strong version of these accounts postulates serial order maintenance as emerging from the pattern of activation occurring in the linguistic system. In the present study, we tested this assumption via a computational modeling approach by implementing a purely activation-based architecture. We tested this architecture against several experiments involving the manipulation of semantic relatedness, a psycholinguistic variable that has been shown to interact with serial order processing in a complex manner. We show that this activation-based architecture struggles to account for interactions between semantic knowledge and serial order processing. This study fails to support activated long-term memory as an exclusive mechanism supporting serial order maintenance.

Indexed as

Memory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermHumansMental RecallPsycholinguisticsSemanticsSerial LearningComputational modelingSemantic knowledgeSerial orderWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID33765248
PMCPMC8367891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.