Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765197›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2021

A phenomenological investigation of patients' experiences during direct observation in residency: busting the myth of the fly on the wall.

Chris B T Rietmeijer, Mark Deves, Suzanne C M van Esch, Henriëtte E van der Horst, Annette H Blankenstein, Mario Veen, Fedde Scheele, Pim W Teunissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chris B T RietmeijerDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. C.Rietmeijer@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-8673
Mark DevesDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne C M van EschDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henriëtte E van der HorstDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annette H BlankensteinDepartment of General Practice/Family Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario VeenDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rtterdam, The Netherlands.
Fedde ScheeleAmsterdam University Medical Centers, School of Medical Sciences, Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, VU University, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Pim W TeunissenSchool of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct observation (DO) of residents by supervisors is a highly recommended educational tool in postgraduate medical education, yet its uptake is poor. Residents and supervisors report various reasons for not engaging in DO. Some of these relate to their interaction with patients during DO. We do not know the patient perspectives on these interactions, nor, more broadly, what it is like to be a patient in a DO situation. Understanding the patient perspective may lead to a more complete understanding of the dynamics in DO situations, which may benefit patient wellbeing and improve the use of DO as an educational tool. We conducted a phenomenological interview study to investigate the experience of being a patient in a DO situation. Our analysis included multiple rounds of coding and identifying themes, and a final phase of phenomenological reduction to arrive at the essential elements of the experience. Constant reflexivity was at the heart of this process. Our results provide a new perspective on the role of the supervisor in DO situations. Patients were willing to address the resident, but sought moments of contact with, and some participation by, the supervisor. Consequently, conceptions of DO in which the supervisor thinks she is a fly on the wall rather than a part of the interaction, should be critically reviewed. To that end, we propose the concept of participative direct observation in workplace learning, which also acknowledges the observer's role as participant. Embracing this concept may benefit both patients' wellbeing and residents' learning.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleHumansLearningWorkplaceAssessmentDirect observationFeedbackParticipative direct observationPatient centerednessPatients' experiencePatient wellbeingPhenomenologyPost-graduate medical educationResidency

Identifiers

PMID33765197
PMCPMC8452584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.