Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765042›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: A pilot study.

Renata Travassos da Rosa Moreira Bastos, Priscila Teixeira da Silva, David Normando

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05791175 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Stress and Tooth Structure Loss in Dental Students. A Prospective, Longitudinal Pilot - Observational Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2023 to 2026Enrolled25ConditionsTooth WearArmsTeeth scan with intraoral scanner (Trios, 3 Shape, Denmark)
NCT05843513 completednot on this map

Tooth Wear Monitoring Using Intraoral Scanner. Identification of Etiological Factors and Patient Satisfaction.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversidad Europea de MadridRan2019 to 2021Enrolled46ConditionsDental WearArmsMonitoring (observational study)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renata Travassos da Rosa Moreira BastosPost-Graduation Program of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9349-1747
Priscila Teixeira da SilvaDental School, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
David NormandoDepartment of Orthodontics, Dental School, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Pará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental wear analysis through the use of an intraoral scanner is a reality of modern dentistry. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of qualitative tooth wear evaluation through three-dimensional images captured with an intraoral scanner and compared to clinical and photographic examinations. Eighteen adult volunteers of both genders (18 to 55 years old) were submitted to clinical exams, intraoral photographs and intraoral scanning protocol using an optical scanner (TRIOS® Pod, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Occlusal tooth wear, from second to second premolars, was measured by two evaluators and reevaluated after 30 days, according to a slight modification of the method described by Mockers et al. Weighted Kappa was used to measure intra and inter-examiner agreement. The Friedman test was used to verify the differences among methods. Random and systematic errors were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. All statistical analysis was performed with p<0.05. There was a substantive agreement for clinical (K = 0.75) and photographic exams (K = 0.79) and a moderate agreement for intraoral scanner analysis (K = 0.60) for inter-examiner evaluation. A substantial intra-examiner agreement was obtained for both evaluators. No significant difference between the methods was observed (p = 0.7343 for examiner 1 and 0.8007 for examiner 2). The Bland-Altman plot confirmed no systematic errors between the methods and a random error of 0.25 with the scanner method when compared to clinical assessment. All three methods showed reliability in qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation. Intraoral scanning seems to be a sound and reliable tool to evaluate tooth wear when compared to traditional methods, considering the lower inter-examiner agreement and the inherent limitations of this pilot study. Further research will be necessary in order to achieve more robust evidence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedMouthPhotographyPilot ProjectsTooth WearYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33765042
PMCPMC7993778
OpenAlexW3138611562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.