ArticlePloS one2021
Reliability of qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation using an intraoral scanner: A pilot study.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Stress and Tooth Structure Loss in Dental Students. A Prospective, Longitudinal Pilot - Observational Study.
Tooth Wear Monitoring Using Intraoral Scanner. Identification of Etiological Factors and Patient Satisfaction.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative 48 month randomized trial of clinical performance and wear of BISGMA based and BISGMA free nanoceramic resin composites.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Digital Visual Assessment of Tooth Wear: Practical Comparison of BEWE, Simplified TWI and TWES 2.0 on Intraoral Scans with Exploratory Sex-Stratified Observations.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Digital Dentistry in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review of Current Capabilities and Future Directions.International dental journal · 2026Article
- A reliability assessment of the basic erosive wear examination and the tooth wear evaluation system 2.0 utilizing intraoral scan data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Human identification through 3D images: a comparative method based on common dental morphological traits.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2025Article
- Reliability of the Assessment of Tooth Wear Severity on Dental Hard Tissues and Dental Restorations, Using the TWES 2.0, by Nonexperts.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Tooth wear and tertiary crowding: a 13-year cohort study in Amazon Indigenous populations.Progress in orthodontics · 2025Article
- Orofacial assessment as digital path for forensic and legal evidence record.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- Intraoral Scanning for Monitoring Dental Wear and Its Risk Factors: A Prospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Applications of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2023Review
- Application of the Intraoral Scanner in the Diagnosis of Dental Wear: An In Vivo Study of Tooth Wear Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental wear analysis through the use of an intraoral scanner is a reality of modern dentistry. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of qualitative tooth wear evaluation through three-dimensional images captured with an intraoral scanner and compared to clinical and photographic examinations. Eighteen adult volunteers of both genders (18 to 55 years old) were submitted to clinical exams, intraoral photographs and intraoral scanning protocol using an optical scanner (TRIOS® Pod, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). Occlusal tooth wear, from second to second premolars, was measured by two evaluators and reevaluated after 30 days, according to a slight modification of the method described by Mockers et al. Weighted Kappa was used to measure intra and inter-examiner agreement. The Friedman test was used to verify the differences among methods. Random and systematic errors were assessed using Bland-Altman plots. All statistical analysis was performed with p<0.05. There was a substantive agreement for clinical (K = 0.75) and photographic exams (K = 0.79) and a moderate agreement for intraoral scanner analysis (K = 0.60) for inter-examiner evaluation. A substantial intra-examiner agreement was obtained for both evaluators. No significant difference between the methods was observed (p = 0.7343 for examiner 1 and 0.8007 for examiner 2). The Bland-Altman plot confirmed no systematic errors between the methods and a random error of 0.25 with the scanner method when compared to clinical assessment. All three methods showed reliability in qualitative occlusal tooth wear evaluation. Intraoral scanning seems to be a sound and reliable tool to evaluate tooth wear when compared to traditional methods, considering the lower inter-examiner agreement and the inherent limitations of this pilot study. Further research will be necessary in order to achieve more robust evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.