Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33765014›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Parameters and determinants of responses to selection in antibody libraries.

Steven Schulz, Sébastien Boyer, Matteo Smerlak, Simona Cocco, Rémi Monasson, Clément Nizak, Olivier Rivoire

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Steven SchulzCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB), Collège de France, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, PSL University, Paris, France.
Sébastien BoyerDépartement de biochimie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0248-2915
Matteo SmerlakMax Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-8868
Simona CoccoLaboratory of Physics of École Normale Supérieure, UMR 8023, CNRS & PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-7789
Rémi MonassonLaboratory of Physics of École Normale Supérieure, UMR 8023, CNRS & PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4459-0204
Clément NizakLaboratory of Biochemistry, CBI, UMR 8231, ESPCI Paris, PSL University, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4591-8240
Olivier RivoireCenter for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology (CIRB), Collège de France, CNRS UMR 7241, INSERM U1050, PSL University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1820-1324
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMax Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences · DEUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sequences of antibodies from a given repertoire are highly diverse at few sites located on the surface of a genome-encoded larger scaffold. The scaffold is often considered to play a lesser role than highly diverse, non-genome-encoded sites in controlling binding affinity and specificity. To gauge the impact of the scaffold, we carried out quantitative phage display experiments where we compare the response to selection for binding to four different targets of three different antibody libraries based on distinct scaffolds but harboring the same diversity at randomized sites. We first show that the response to selection of an antibody library may be captured by two measurable parameters. Second, we provide evidence that one of these parameters is determined by the degree of affinity maturation of the scaffold, affinity maturation being the process by which antibodies accumulate somatic mutations to evolve towards higher affinities during the natural immune response. In all cases, we find that libraries of antibodies built around maturated scaffolds have a lower response to selection to other arbitrary targets than libraries built around germline-based scaffolds. We thus propose that germline-encoded scaffolds have a higher selective potential than maturated ones as a consequence of a selection for this potential over the long-term evolution of germline antibody genes. Our results are a first step towards quantifying the evolutionary potential of biomolecules.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryAntibodiesComputational BiologyDNAEvolution, MolecularHumansAntibodiesDNA

Identifiers

PMID33765014
PMCPMC7993935
OpenAlexW3139465356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.