Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764999›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Suitability of current typing procedures to identify epidemiologically linked human Giardia duodenalis isolates.

Andreas Woschke, Mirko Faber, Klaus Stark, Martha Holtfreter, Frank Mockenhaupt, Joachim Richter, Thomas Regnath, Ingo Sobottka, Ingrid Reiter-Owona, Andreas Diefenbach and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Dual detection and novel genotypes ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Genotyping and distribution ofParasitology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Autochthonous and imported giardiasis cases: An analysis of two decades of national surveillance data, Germany, 2002 to 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Subspecific Nomenclature ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Multilocus sequence typing ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Zoonotic giardiasis: an update.Parasitology research · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The controversies surroundingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andreas WoschkeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Unit for Mycotic and Parasitic Agents and Mycobacteria, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Mirko FaberDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Gastrointestinal Infections, Zoonoses and Tropical Infections Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9196-570X
Klaus StarkDepartment for Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Gastrointestinal Infections, Zoonoses and Tropical Infections Unit, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Martha HoltfreterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Frank MockenhauptInstitute of Tropical Medicine and International Health, Charité University Medicine and Berlin Institute of Health, Corporate member of Free University Berlin and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8117-5421
Joachim RichterDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Thomas RegnathLaboratory Enders and Partners, Stuttgart, Germany.
Ingo SobottkaLADR GmbH, Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum, Geesthacht, Germany.
Ingrid Reiter-OwonaInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology (IMMIP), University Clinic Bonn, Germany.
Andreas DiefenbachLaboratory of Innate Immunity, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9176-9530
Petra Gosten-HeinrichDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Unit for Mycotic and Parasitic Agents and Mycobacteria, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2809-5542
Johannes FriesenMVZ Labor 28, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-2988
Ralf IgnatiusLaboratory of Innate Immunity, Institute of Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Toni AebischerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Unit for Mycotic and Parasitic Agents and Mycobacteria, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Christian KlotzDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Unit for Mycotic and Parasitic Agents and Mycobacteria, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2609-9654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiardia duodenalis is a leading cause of gastroenteritis worldwide. Humans are mainly infected by two different subtypes, i.e., assemblage A and B. Genotyping is hampered by allelic sequence heterozygosity (ASH) mainly in assemblage B, and by occurrence of mixed infections. Here we assessed the suitability of current genotyping protocols of G. duodenalis for epidemiological applications such as molecular tracing of transmission chains. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTwo G. duodenalis isolate collections, from an outpatient tropical medicine clinic and from several primary care laboratories, were characterized by assemblage-specific qPCR (TIF, CATH gene loci) and a common multi locus sequence typing (MLST; TPI, BG, GDH gene loci). Assemblage A isolates were further typed at additional loci (HCMP22547, CID1, RHP26, HCMP6372, DIS3, NEK15411). Of 175/202 (86.6%) patients the G. duodenalis assemblage could be identified: Assemblages A 25/175 (14.3%), B 115/175 (65.7%) and A+B mixed 35/175 (20.0%). By incorporating allelic sequence heterozygosity in the analysis, the three marker MLST correctly identified 6/9 (66,7%) and 4/5 (80.0%) consecutive samples from chronic assemblage B infections in the two collections, respectively, and identified a cluster of five independent patients carrying assemblage B parasites of identical MLST type. Extended MLST for assemblage A altogether identified 5/6 (83,3%) consecutive samples from chronic assemblage A infections and 15 novel genotypes. Based on the observed A+B mixed infections it is estimated that only 75% and 50% of assemblage A or B only cases represent single strain infections, respectively. We demonstrate that typing results are consistent with this prediction. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Typing of assemblage A and B isolates with resolution for epidemiological applications is possible but requires separate genotyping protocols. The high frequency of multiple infections and their impact on typing results are findings with immediate consequences for result interpretation in this field.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGiardia lambliaGiardiasisHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedMultilocus Sequence Typing

Identifiers

PMID33764999
PMCPMC8023459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.