Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764818›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021

Risk Prediction Using Bayesian Networks: An Immunotherapy Case Study in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Alind Gupta, Paul Arora, Darren Brenner, Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle, Devon J Boyne, Mark Edmondson-Jones, Elena Parkhomenko, Warren Stevens, Shaan Dudani, Daniel Y C Heng and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Immunotherapy and Cancer: The Multi-Omics Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Alind GuptaCytel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1139-9769
Paul AroraCytel, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-3631
Darren BrennerUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3027-290X
Jacqueline Vanderpuye-OrgleParexel, Billerica, MA.
Devon J BoyneUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6301-2429
Mark Edmondson-JonesParexel, London, United Kingdom.
Elena ParkhomenkoParexel, London, United Kingdom.
Warren StevensParexel, London, United Kingdom.
Shaan DudaniUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4958-381X
Daniel Y C HengUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-1243
Samuel WagnerBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.ORCID 0000-0001-8844-4746
John BorrillBristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, United Kingdom.
Elise WuBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
University of Calgary · CAPAREXEL International (United Kingdom) · GBBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) · GBPAREXEL International (United States) · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo address the need for more accurate risk stratification models for cancer immuno-oncology, this study aimed to develop a machine-learned Bayesian network model (BNM) for predicting outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) being treated with immunotherapy.

methodsPatient-level data from the randomized, phase III CheckMate 025 clinical trial comparing nivolumab with everolimus for second-line treatment in patients with mRCC were used to develop the BNM. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), all-cause adverse events, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) over 36 months after treatment initiation. External validation of the model's predictions for OS was conducted using data from select centers from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC).

resultsAreas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for BNM-based classification of OS using baseline data were 0.74, 0.71, and 0.68 over months 12, 24, and 36, respectively. AUC for OS at 12 months increased to 0.86 when treatment response and progression status in year 1 were included as predictors; progression and response at 12 months were highly prognostic of all outcomes over the 36-month period. AUCs for adverse events and treatment-related adverse events were approximately 0.6 at 12 months but increased to approximately 0.7 by 36 months. Sensitivity analysis comparing the BNM with machine learning classifiers showed comparable performance. Test AUC on IMDC data for 12-month OS was 0.71 despite several variable imbalances. Notably, the BNM outperformed the IMDC risk score alone.

conclusionThe validated BNM performed well at prediction using baseline data, particularly with the inclusion of response and progression at 12 months. Additionally, the results suggest that 12 months of follow-up data alone may be sufficient to inform long-term survival projections in patients with mRCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBayes TheoremDisease-Free SurvivalHumansImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33764818
PMCPMC8140790
OpenAlexW3136630340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.