Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764686›Full record

Observational studyPharmacology research & perspectives2021

Effects of dosing frequency on the clinical efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam in Japanese elderly patients with pneumonia: A single-center retrospective observational study.

Tomokazu Suzuki, Erika Sugiyama, Kenji Nozawa, Masataka Tajima, Kyoka Takahashi, Masayoshi Yoshii, Hidenori Suzuki, Vilasinee H Sato, Hitoshi Sato

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomokazu SuzukiDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9555-9840
Erika SugiyamaDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji NozawaDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masataka TajimaDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kyoka TakahashiDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi YoshiiDepartment of Pharmacy, Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Takanawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidenori SuzukiDepartment of Pharmacy, Japan Community Health Care Organization Tokyo Takanawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Vilasinee H SatoDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hitoshi SatoDivision of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan.
Showa University · JPJapan Community Healthcare Organization · JPMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to investigate whether dosing frequency (the number of doses per day) affects the antimicrobial efficacy and safety of ampicillin/sulbactam (ABPC/SBT) in Japanese elderly pneumonia patients treated with ABPC/SBT at 6 g/day. This was a retrospective observational study that included hospitalized elderly patients (aged ≥75 years, 10 ml/min ≤CLcr <50 ml/min) who received 3 g every 12 h (BID; n = 61) or 1.5 g every 6 h (QID; n = 45) for the treatment of pneumonia. The primary endpoint was clinical response, assessed by measuring body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein levels. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulations were conducted in silico to rationalize the clinical findings. The clinical response rates (extremely effective and effective) in the BID and QID groups were 36.1% and 55.6%, respectively (p = .0459). QID tended to be more effective in patients with gram-negative rods detected (p = .0563). According to the simulated minimum plasma ABPC concentrations at steady state for BID and QID were 2.5 and 7.3 μg/ml, respectively (p < .0001). Based on the simulated time above minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), pharmacological (not clinical) efficacy was predicted to be higher with QID. Both groups had similar safety profiles. The main adverse event in both groups was liver damage. The present retrospective survey demonstrated that ABPC/SBT treatment for elderly patients with pneumonia and renal dysfunction was more effective with QID than with BID. Therefore, the QID regimen is worthy of consideration to improve the clinical outcomes of ABPC/SBT therapy in the present patient population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansInjections, IntravenousMalePneumonia, BacterialRenal EliminationRetrospective StudiesAmpicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsSulbactamsultamicillinampicillin/sulbactamelderly patientspharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamicspneumoniaretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID33764686
PMCPMC7992287
OpenAlexW3138695093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.