Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764577›Full record

ReviewJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2021

Photoprotection according to skin phototype and dermatoses: practical recommendations from an expert panel.

T Passeron, H W Lim, C-L Goh, H Y Kang, F Ly, A Morita, J Ocampo Candiani, S Puig, S Schalka, L Wei and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Perceptions Regarding the Use of Sunscreen Among Pharmacists in Jordan.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. What's New in Photoprotection?American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

T PasseronDepartment of Dermatology, Côte d'Azur University, Nice University Hospital Center, Nice, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0797-6570
H W LimDepartment of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
C-L GohNational Skin Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
H Y KangDepartment of Dermatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.
F LyDepartment of Dermatology, Cheikh Anta Diop Dakar University, EPS Institute of Social Hygiene, Dakar, Senegal.
A MoritaDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
J Ocampo CandianiDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty University Hospital of Nuevo León, Monterrey, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0213-0031
S PuigMelanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Barcelona University Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
S SchalkaMedcin Skin Research Center and Biochemistry Department, Chemistry Institute of São Paulo University, São Paulo, Brazil.
L WeiDepartment of Dermatology, The General Hospital of Air Force PLA, Beijing, China.
B DrénoDepartment of Dermato-Oncology, CIC 1413, CRCINA, Nantes University Hospital Center, Nantes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5574-5825
J KrutmannIUF Leibniz Research Institute for Environmental Medicine, Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-1517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing evidence on the impact of the different wavelengths of sunlight on the skin demonstrates the need for tailored recommendations of sunscreen according to skin phototype and dermatoses, which is now possible due to advances in the filters and formulations of sunscreens. A selective literature search was performed by an international expert panel, focusing on the type of sunscreen to recommend for photoaging, skin cancers, photodermatoses, pigmentary disorders and skin inflammatory disorders. Protection against ultraviolet (UV)B is especially important for light skin as there is a high risk of sunburn, DNA damage and skin cancers. Darker skin may be naturally better protected against UVB but is more prone to hyperpigmentation induced by visible light (VL) and UVA. Protection against UVA, VL and infrared A can be helpful for all skin phototypes as they penetrate deeply and cause photoaging. Long-wave UVA1 plays a critical role in pigmentation, photoaging, skin cancer, DNA damage and photodermatoses. Adapting the formulation and texture of the sunscreen to the type of skin and dermatoses is also essential. Practical recommendations on the type of sunscreen to prescribe are provided to support the clinician in daily practice.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSunburnHumansSunlightSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysSunscreening Agents

Identifiers

PMID33764577
PMCPMC8252523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.