Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764384›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2021

Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Vivek Labhishetty, Steven A Cholewiak, Austin Roorda, Martin S Banks

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Influence of Light Wavelength and Optotype Size on Accommodative Response and Aberrometric Changes Across the Adult Lifespan.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Longitudinal Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Accommodation in Young Children.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Optical and Visual Diet in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  8. Refractive development II: Modelling normal and myopic eye growth.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Objective Quantification and Topographic Dioptric Demand of Near-Work.Translational vision science & technology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Accommodation lags are higher in myopia than in emmetropia: Measurement methods and metrics matter.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivek LabhishettyOptometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Steven A CholewiakOptometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Austin RoordaOptometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Martin S BanksOptometry & Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
University of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focusing response of the human eye - accommodation - exhibits errors known as lags and leads. Lags occur when the stimulus is near and the eye appears to focus farther than the stimulus. Leads occur with far stimuli where the eye appears to focus nearer than the stimulus. We used objective and subjective measures simultaneously to determine where the eye is best focused. The objective measures were made with a wavefront sensor and an autorefractor, both of which analyze light reflected from the retina. These measures exhibited typical accommodative errors, mostly lags. The subjective measure was visual acuity, which of course depends not only on the eye's optics but also on photoreception and neural processing of the retinal image. The subjective measure revealed much smaller errors. Acuity was maximized at or very close to the distance of the accommodative stimulus. Thus, accommodation is accurate in terms of maximizing visual performance.

Indexed as

Accommodation, OcularAdultFemaleHumansMaleOptics and PhotonicsRetinaVisual AcuityVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33764384
PMCPMC7995353
OpenAlexW3136710249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.