ArticlePsychological assessment2021
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Adherence Coding Scale (DBT ACS): Psychometric properties.
Article in Psychological assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05583279 (Implementation of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy in Juvenile Justice to Reduce Self-Harm and Increase Quality of Life), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy in Juvenile Justice to Reduce Self-Harm and Increase Quality of Life: A Pilot Test
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meditation, mindfulness, and acceptance methods in psychotherapy: A systematic review.Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research · 2023Pooled it
- Applying new RDoC dimensions to the development of emotion regulation: Examining the influence of maternal emotion regulation on within-individual change in child emotion regulation.Development and psychopathology · 2021Trial
- An implementation "Field Trial" of DBT for adolescents with bipolar disorder: Training procedures and therapist outcomes.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- An examination of the role of PTSD and childhood trauma on treatment outcomes for individuals with borderline personality disorder in dialectical behavior therapy.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- Trauma-focused dialectical behavior therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled multi-center trial in online and face-to-face formats.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- How mothers with severe emotion dysregulation use DBT skills in parenting contexts: observational coding of skills use in a DBT skills training group.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and Evaluation of a Pragmatic Measure of Adherence to Dialectical Behavior Therapy: The DBT Adherence Checklist for Individual Therapy.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
- Making Lemonade out of Lemons: Dialectical Behavior Therapy via Telehealth During a Pandemic.Behavior therapy · 2023Article
- The temporal relationships between therapist adherence and patient outcomes in dialectical behavior therapy.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Dialectical Behavior Therapy Adherence Coding Scale (DBT ACS) is an observer-rated measure used to evaluate the extent to which therapists deliver individual and group DBT with adherence to the manual. Despite its frequent use in clinical trials of DBT, relatively little is known about its psychometric properties. The present study utilized data from six clinical trials conducted in research and community settings with a variety of patient populations. Across these studies, the DBT ACS was used to code a total of 1,271 DBT individual therapy sessions and 180 DBT group sessions. Results indicate the DBT ACS computed global score has good internal consistency (α = .81) and excellent interrater reliability (ICC = .93). A confirmatory factor analysis found that a single factor yielded acceptable goodness of fit indices. The DBT ACS discriminated between DBT and another treatment and between research and community therapists. Across studies, variability in adherence scores was attributable more to therapists (33%) than to patients (15%). Both therapist and patient variability were higher in effectiveness than efficacy trials. Generalizability coefficients indicated that 5 sessions are needed to estimate a dependable adherence score at the patient level, whereas 9-15 sessions are needed to achieve adequate generalizability at the therapist level. Fewer sessions were needed to yield dependable scores for community therapists compared to research therapists. The DBT ACS appears to be a reliable, valid, and dependable method of assessing therapist adherence to individual and group DBT across diverse treatment settings, therapist types, and patient populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.