Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33764050›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021

Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.

Edward King, Ruxi Qi, Han Li, Ray Luo, Erick Aitchison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Edward King
Ruxi QiCryo-EM Center, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9243-1259
Han Li
University of California, Irvine · USSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

Multi-scaled Modeling of Electrostatic and Polarization Effects in BiomoleculesR35GM130367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI RAY LUO · 2019 to 2026
$3.0M
AMBER/PBSA: An Open-Source Computer Program for Accurate and Scalable Solvation Analysis ofBiomoleculesR01GM093040 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LUO, RAY · 2010 to 2018
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093040NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM130367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBinding SitesElectricityLigandsProteinsProtonsThermodynamicsLigandsProteinsProtons

Identifiers

PMID33764050
PMCPMC8254375
OpenAlexW3138309048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.