ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021
Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Optimal Dielectric Boundary for Binding Free Energy Estimates in the Implicit Solvent.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Assessment of Amino Acid Electrostatic Parametrizations of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
- Transferability of the Electrostatic Parameters of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023Article
- The Importance of Charge Transfer and Solvent Screening in the Interactions of Backbones and Functional Groups in Amino Acid Residues and Nucleotides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Accurate Reproduction of Quantum Mechanical Many-Body Interactions in Peptide Main-Chain Hydrogen-Bonding Oligomers by the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2022Article
- Identifying the Hot Spot Residues of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Using MM-PBSA and Multiple Force Fields.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of binding free energies is critical to streamlining the drug development and protein design process. With the advent of GPU acceleration, absolute alchemical methods, which simulate the removal of ligand electrostatics and van der Waals interactions with the protein, have become routinely accessible and provide a physically rigorous approach that enables full consideration of flexibility and solvent interaction. However, standard explicit solvent simulations are unable to model protonation or electronic polarization changes upon ligand transfer from water to the protein interior, leading to inaccurate prediction of binding affinities for charged molecules. Here, we perform extensive simulation totaling ∼540 μs to benchmark the impact of modeling conditions on predictive accuracy for absolute alchemical simulations. Binding to urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA), a protein frequently overexpressed in metastatic tumors, is evaluated for a set of 10 inhibitors with extended flexibility, highly charged character, and titratable properties. We demonstrate that the alchemical simulations can be adapted to utilize the MBAR/PBSA method to improve the accuracy upon incorporating electronic polarization, highlighting the importance of polarization in alchemical simulations of binding affinities. Comparison of binding energy prediction at various protonation states indicates that proper electrostatic setup is also crucial in binding affinity prediction of charged systems, prompting us to propose an alternative binding mode with protonated ligand phenol and Hid-46 at the binding site, a testable hypothesis for future experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.