ArticleMolecular ecology resources2021
Log-ratio analysis of microbiome data with many zeroes is library size dependent.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low Prevalence and Abundance ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Score Matching for Differential Abundance Testing of Compositional High-Throughput Sequencing Data.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Oral short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria may be associated with biological age and cognition among the oldest old.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- parafac4microbiome: exploratory analysis of longitudinal microbiome data using parallel factor analysis.mSystems · 2025Article
- Rarefaction is currently the best approach to control for uneven sequencing effort in amplicon sequence analyses.mSphere · 2024Article
- Waste not, want not: revisiting the analysis that called into question the practice of rarefaction.mSphere · 2024Article
- Novel Application of Survival Models for Predicting Microbial Community Transitions with Variable Selection for Environmental DNA.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiome composition data collected through amplicon sequencing are count data on taxa in which the total count per sample (the library size) is an artefact of the sequencing platform, and as a result, such data are compositional. To avoid library size dependency, one common way of analysing multivariate compositional data is to perform a principal component analysis (PCA) on data transformed with the centred log-ratio, hereafter called a log-ratio PCA. Two aspects typical of amplicon sequencing data are the large differences in library size and the large number of zeroes. In this study, we show on real data and by simulation that, applied to data that combine these two aspects, log-ratio PCA is nevertheless heavily dependent on the library size. This leads to a reduction in power when testing against any explanatory variable in log-ratio redundancy analysis. If there is additionally a correlation between the library size and the explanatory variable, then the type 1 error becomes inflated. We explore putative solutions to this problem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.