Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33763934›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2021

Variety of size and form of GRM2 bacterial microcompartment particles.

Eva Emilija Cesle, Anatolij Filimonenko, Kaspars Tars, Gints Kalnins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Electrochemical cofactor recycling of bacterial microcompartments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Variety of size and form of GRM2 bacterial microcompartment particles.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva Emilija CesleStructural Biology, Biotechnology and Virusology Laboratory, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia.
Anatolij FilimonenkoCEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Kaspars TarsStructural Biology, Biotechnology and Virusology Laboratory, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-9023
Gints KalninsStructural Biology, Biotechnology and Virusology Laboratory, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9593-6308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial microcompartments (BMCs) are bacterial organelles involved in enzymatic processes, such as carbon fixation, choline, ethanolamine and propanediol degradation, and others. Formed of a semi-permeable protein shell and an enzymatic core, they can enhance enzyme performance and protect the cell from harmful intermediates. With the ability to encapsulate non-native enzymes, BMCs show high potential for applied use. For this goal, a detailed look into shell form variability is significant to predict shell adaptability. Here we present four novel 3D cryo-EM maps of recombinant Klebsiella pneumoniae GRM2 BMC shell particles with the resolution in range of 9 to 22 Å and nine novel 2D classes corresponding to discrete BMC shell forms. These structures reveal icosahedral, elongated, oblate, multi-layered and polyhedral traits of BMCs, indicating considerable variation in size and form as well as adaptability during shell formation processes.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCryoelectron MicroscopyKlebsiella pneumoniaeBacterial Proteinsbacterial microcompartmentscryo-EMGRM2Klebsiella pneumoniae

Identifiers

PMID33763934
PMCPMC8040866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.