Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33763815›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2021

Selective memory disrupted in intra-modal dual-task encoding conditions.

Alexander L M Siegel, Shawn T Schwartz, Alan D Castel

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Serial and strategic memory processes in younger and older adults.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander L M SiegelDepartment of Psychology, University of California, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. almsiegel@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-4461
Shawn T SchwartzDepartment of Psychology, University of California, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6444-8451
Alan D CastelDepartment of Psychology, University of California, 502 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1965-8227
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Goals and Motivation to Remember Important Information in Old AgeR01AG044335 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CASTEL, ALAN D · 2013 to 2025
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given natural memory limitations, people can generally attend to and remember high-value over low-value information even when cognitive resources are depleted in older age and under divided attention during encoding, representing an important form of cognitive control. In the current study, we examined whether tasks requiring overlapping processing resources may impair the ability to selectively encode information in dual-task conditions. Participants in the divided-attention conditions of Experiment 1 completed auditory tone-distractor tasks that required them to discriminate between tones of different pitches (audio-nonspatial) or auditory channels (audio-spatial), while studying items in different locations in a grid (visual-spatial) differing in reward value. Results indicated that, while reducing overall memory accuracy, neither cross-modal auditory distractor task influenced participants' ability to selectively encode high-value items relative to a full attention condition, suggesting maintained cognitive control. Participants in Experiment 2 studied the same important visual-spatial information while completing demanding color (visual-nonspatial) or pattern (visual-spatial) discrimination tasks during study. While the cross-modal visual-nonspatial task did not influence memory selectivity, the intra-modal visual-spatial secondary task eliminated participants' sensitivity to item value. These results add novel evidence of conditions of impaired cognitive control, suggesting that the effectiveness of top-down, selective encoding processes is attenuated when concurrent tasks rely on overlapping processing resources.

Indexed as

AttentionMental RecallAgedHumansAttentionMemoryModalitySelectivitySpatialVisual

Identifiers

PMID33763815
PMCPMC8460703
OpenAlexW3136727693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.