Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33763806›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2022

Outcomes of cancer survivorship education and training for primary care providers: a systematic review.

Raymond J Chan, Oluwaseyifunmi Andi Agbejule, Patsy M Yates, Jon Emery, Michael Jefford, Bogda Koczwara, Nicolas H Hart, Megan Crichton, Larissa Nekhlyudov

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Survivorship care for people affected by advanced or metastatic cancer: MASCC-ASCO standards and practice recommendations.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Impact of Video-Based and ECHO™ Survivorship Training on Primary Care Providers' Self-Efficacy and Communication.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Developing the multidisciplinary and multispecialty workforce and the systems needed to sustain high-quality care from diagnosis through long-term survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  9. Benefits of Utilizing Experiential Learning in a Medical School Cancer Survivorship Course.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. The implementation of a novel adult cancer survivorship curriculum in a family medicine residency program: a mixed methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Small steps, big impact: redefining cancer survival through lifestyle.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Raymond J ChanCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. raymond.chan@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0248-7046
Oluwaseyifunmi Andi AgbejuleCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Patsy M YatesCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jon EmeryCentre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael JeffordCentre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Bogda KoczwaraFlinders Center for Innovation in Cancer and Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nicolas H HartCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Megan CrichtonCancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Larissa NekhlyudovDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Queensland University of Technology · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUBrigham and Women's Hospital · USEdith Cowan University · AUFlinders University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify published literature regarding cancer survivorship education programs for primary care providers (PCPs) and assess their outcomes.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched between January 2005 and September 2020. The Quality of Cancer Survivorship Care Framework and Kirkpatrick's 4-level evaluation model were used to summarize program content and outcomes, respectively. Data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted by two authors.

resultsTwenty-one studies were included, describing self-directed online courses (n=4), presentations (n=2), workshops and training sessions (n=6), placement programs (n=3), a live webinar, a fellowship program, a referral program, a survivorship conference, a dual in-person workshop and webinar, and an in-person seminar and online webinar series. Eight studies described the use of a learner framework or theory to guide program development. All 21 programs were generally beneficial to PCP learners (e.g., increased confidence, knowledge, behavior change); however, methodological bias suggests caution in accepting claims. Three studies reported positive outcomes at the patient level (i.e., satisfaction with care) and organizational level (i.e., increased screening referrals, changes to institution practice standards).

conclusionsA range of cancer survivorship PCP education programs exist. Evidence for clinical effectiveness was rarely reported. Future educational programs should be tailored to PCPs, utilize an evidence-based survivorship framework, and evaluate patient- and system-level outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: PCPs have an important role in addressing the diverse health care needs of cancer survivors. Improving the content, approach, and evaluation of PCP-focused cancer survivorship education programs could have a positive impact on health outcomes among cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsEducational StatusHumansPrimary Health CareSurvivorshipCancerEducationEvaluationPrimary careSurvivorshipTheory

Identifiers

PMID33763806
PMCPMC7990618
OpenAlexW3136731815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.