Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33763749›Full record

ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2021

[Pre- and post-interventional skin care for laser and peel treatments].

F Pahnke, M Peckruhn, P Elsner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F PahnkeKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erfurter Str. 35, 07743, Jena, Deutschland. franziska.pahnke@med.uni-jena.de.
M PeckruhnKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erfurter Str. 35, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.
P ElsnerKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Erfurter Str. 35, 07743, Jena, Deutschland.
Jena University Hospital · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treating the signs of skin ageing or acne scars by chemical peels or ablative lasers is increasingly used worldwide. Due to their reduced invasiveness, these methods are often favored over aesthetic surgical interventions. Both procedures rely on the principle of controlled damage to the skin. The subsequent regeneration may lead to the development of new epidermal (and dermal) tissue and therefore improve the skin's aesthetic appearance. At present, there are no official guidelines in Germany concerning pre- and post-interventional skin care, which is currently based on the personal experiences and evaluations of the practitioner. It is known that an appropriate treatment regime can improve the outcome and reduces downtime pre- and post-laser as well as pre- and post-peel. The aim of this article is to present the different possibilities of pre- and post-interventional care. In most cases, priming includes intense ultraviolet (UV) protection, topical retinoids as well as skin brightening agents, and occasionally oral herpes simplex prophylaxis. In order to support post-interventional wound healing, skin care should modulate inflammation and balance skin hydration. In addition to light moisturizers, broad spectrum UV protection as well as the avoidance of sports and sweating are essential.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisChemexfoliationCicatrixGermanyHumansLasersSkin CareAcne vulgarisChemexfoliationRetinoidsSkin agingSkin care

Identifiers

PMID33763749
OpenAlexW3138579660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.