Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33763204›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2020

Building a successful international research community through data sharing: The case of the Wheat Information System (WheatIS).

Taner Z Sen, Mario Caccamo, David Edwards, Hadi Quesneville

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. SyntenyViewer: a comparative genomics-driven translational research tool.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023
    Article
  3. GrainGenes: a data-rich repository for small grains genetics and genomics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taner Z SenWestern Regional Research Center, Crop Improvement and Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA, USA.
Mario CaccamoNIAB, 93 Lawrence Weaver Road, Cambridge, CB3 0LE, UK.
David EdwardsSchool of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Hadi QuesnevilleUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, URGI, Versailles, 78026, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Wheat Information System (WheatIS) Expert Working Group (EWG) was initiated in 2012 under the Wheat Initiative with a broad range of contributing organizations. The mission of the WheatIS EWG was to create an informational infrastructure, establish data standards, and build a single portal that allows search, retrieval, and display of globally distributed wheat data sets that are indexed in standard data formats at servers around the world. The web portal at WheatIS.org was released publicly in 2015, and by 2020, it expanded to 8 geographically-distributed nodes and around 20 organizations under its umbrella.   In this paper, we present our experience, the challenges we faced, and the answer we brought for establishing an international research community to build an informational infrastructure. Our hope is that our experience with building wheatis.org will guide current and future research communities to facilitate institutional and international challenges to create global tools and resources to help their respective scientific communities.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationTriticumInformation Storage and RetrievalInformation SystemsResearchbioinformaticscommunitydata sharingwheatWheatIS

Identifiers

PMID33763204
PMCPMC7953914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.