ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2021
Prediction Method of Gestational Diabetes Based on Electronic Medical Record Data.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning based model for the early detection of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Prediction of gestational diabetes using deep learning and Bayesian optimization and traditional machine learning techniques.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Retracted: Prediction Method of Gestational Diabetes Based on Electronic Medical Record Data.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- A Novel Extra Tree Ensemble Optimized DL Framework (ETEODL) for Early Detection of Diabetes.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-05-24Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, the secondary application of electronic medical records is focused on auxiliary medical diagnosis to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis. The main research in this article is the prediction method of gestational diabetes based on electronic medical record data. In the original data, the ID number of the medical examiner did not match the medical examination record. In order to ensure the accuracy of the data, this part of the record was removed. First, the preparation stage before building the model is to determine the baseline accuracy of the original data, test the effectiveness of the machine learning algorithm, and then balance the target data set to solve the bias caused by the imbalance between data classes and the illusion of excessive model prediction results. Then, the disease prediction model is constructed by dividing the data set, selecting parameters and algorithms, and visualizing the model. Finally, the effect of predictive model construction is comprehensively judged based on multiple evaluation indicators and control experimental models. In this paper, the RF model can be used to rank the importance of the feature importance of the output feature on the importance of the classification result of the input feature. In order to test the accuracy of regression prediction, the experiment uses absolute mean error and root mean square error to evaluate the accuracy of fasting blood glucose prediction. A logistic regression model is constructed through the training set, and the test set data are brought into the prediction model for prediction. Experimental data show that when the features filtered by WBFS are used, the accuracy,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.