ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2020
The Role of Diagnostic Stewardship in
Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clostridioides difficile Near-Patient Testing Versus Centralized Testing: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Crossover Trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Trial
- Article
- Microbiome signatures ofmSphere · 2025Article
- Diagnosis ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024Review
- Therapeutics involved in managing initial and recurrentWorld journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2024Review
- Impact of customized electronic duplicate order alerts on microbiology test ordering: Financial and environmental cost savings.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Article
- Impact of mandatory nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) testing approval on hospital-onsetInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2024Article
- The impact of autocancellation of uncollectedInfection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Diagnostic stewardship forAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023Article
- Leveraging diagnostic stewardship within antimicrobial stewardship programmes.Drugs in context · 2023Review
- Diagnostic Stewardship in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2022Review
- Impact of Statewide Prevention and Reduction ofBMJ quality & safety · 2022Article
- Bring it on: Top five antimicrobial stewardship challenges in transplant infectious diseases and practical strategies to address them.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewAccurate and timely diagnosis of RECENT
findingsResults from SUMMARY: CDI is a clinical diagnosis supported by laboratory findings. Together, clinical evaluation combined with diagnostic stewardship can optimize the accurate diagnosis of CDI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.