Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762795›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020

Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Energy Fluxes using a Deep-Learning based High-Resolution Emissivity Model and the Two-Source Energy Balance Model with sUAS information.

Alfonso Torres-Rua, Andres M Ticlavilca, Mahyar Aboutalebi, Hector Nieto, Maria Mar Alsina, Alex White, John H Prueger, Joseph Alfieri, Lawrence Hipps, Lynn McKee and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alfonso Torres-RuaUtah State University, Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322.
Andres M TiclavilcaOcean Associates, Inc. Santa Rosa, CA 95404.
Mahyar AboutalebiUtah State University, Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322.
Hector NietoIRTA, Research and Technology Food and Agriculture, Lleida 25003, SPAIN.
Maria Mar AlsinaE & J Gallo Winery Viticulture Research, Modesto, CA 95354, USA.
Alex WhiteU. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
John H PruegerU. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Laboratory for Agriculture and The Environment: Ames, IA 50011, USA.
Joseph AlfieriU. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Lawrence HippsUtah State University, Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322.
Lynn McKeeU. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
William KustasU. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Hydrology and Remote Sensing Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Calvin CoopmansUtah State University, Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322.
Nick DokoozlianE & J Gallo Winery Viticulture Research, Modesto, CA 95354, USA.

Funding

NASA NNX17AF51G
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface temperature is necessary for the estimation of energy fluxes and evapotranspiration from satellites and airborne data sources. For example, the Two-Source Energy Balance (TSEB) model uses thermal information to quantify canopy and soil temperatures as well as their respective energy balance components. While surface (also called kinematic) temperature is desirable for energy balance analysis, obtaining this temperature is not straightforward due to a lack of spatially estimated narrowband (sensor-specific) and broadband emissivities of vegetation and soil, further complicated by spectral characteristics of the UAV thermal camera. This study presents an effort to spatially model narrowband and broadband emissivities for a microbolometer thermal camera at UAV information resolution (~0.15 m) based on Landsat and NASA HyTES information using a deep learning (DL) model. The DL model is calibrated using equivalent optical Landsat / UAV spectral information to spatially estimate narrowband emissivity values of vegetation and soil in the 7-14-nm range at UAV resolution. The resulting DL narrowband emissivity values were then used to estimate broadband emissivity based on a developed narrowband-broadband emissivity relationship using the MODIS UCSB Emissivity Library database. The narrowband and broadband emissivities were incorporated into the TSEB model to determine their impact on the estimation of instantaneous energy balance components against ground measurements. The proposed effort was applied to information collected by the Utah State University AggieAir small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) Program as part of the ARS-USDA GRAPEX Project (Grape Remote sensing Atmospheric Profile and Evapotranspiration eXperiment) over a vineyard located in Lodi, California. A comparison of resulting energy balance component estimates, with and without the inclusion of high-resolution narrowband and broadband emissivities, against eddy covariance (EC) measurements under different scenarios are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

broadband emissivitydeep learningHigh-resolution evapotranspirationLandsatland surface temperaturemicrobolometer cameranarrowband emissivityNASA HYTESUAVUCSB MODIS Emissivity

Identifiers

PMID33762795
PMCPMC7983858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.