Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762770›Full record

ReviewNature2021

A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.

Rosamond L Naylor, Ronald W Hardy, Alejandro H Buschmann, Simon R Bush, Ling Cao, Dane H Klinger, David C Little, Jane Lubchenco, Sandra E Shumway, Max Troell

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 395 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
395citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

395 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Seagrass ecosystems reduce disease risk and economic loss in marine farming production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Detection of zoonotic protozoa in raccoons (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Black soldier fly (Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacteriophages AgainstViruses · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Dietary American Cockroach (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article

335 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rosamond L NaylorDepartment of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. roz@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-3322
Ronald W HardyAquaculture Research Institute, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Alejandro H BuschmannCentro i-mar & CeBiB, Universidad de Los Lagos, Puerto Montt, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3246-681X
Simon R BushEnvironmental Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ling CaoSchool of Oceanography, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dane H KlingerCenter for Oceans, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4178-8167
David C LittleInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Jane LubchencoDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-5879
Sandra E ShumwayDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT, USA.
Max TroellBeijer Institute, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-8140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sustainability of aquaculture has been debated intensely since 2000, when a review on the net contribution of aquaculture to world fish supplies was published in Nature. This paper reviews the developments in global aquaculture from 1997 to 2017, incorporating all industry sub-sectors and highlighting the integration of aquaculture in the global food system. Inland aquaculture-especially in Asia-has contributed the most to global production volumes and food security. Major gains have also occurred in aquaculture feed efficiency and fish nutrition, lowering the fish-in-fish-out ratio for all fed species, although the dependence on marine ingredients persists and reliance on terrestrial ingredients has increased. The culture of both molluscs and seaweed is increasingly recognized for its ecosystem services; however, the quantification, valuation, and market development of these services remain rare. The potential for molluscs and seaweed to support global nutritional security is underexploited. Management of pathogens, parasites, and pests remains a sustainability challenge industry-wide, and the effects of climate change on aquaculture remain uncertain and difficult to validate. Pressure on the aquaculture industry to embrace comprehensive sustainability measures during this 20-year period have improved the governance, technology, siting, and management in many cases.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsAnimals, WildAquacultureFisheriesFishesFood SupplyFresh WaterHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansInternationalityOceans and SeasShellfishSustainable Development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.