Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762678›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2021

Environmental mismatch and obesity in humans: The Jerusalem Perinatal Family Follow-Up Study.

B Savitsky, O Manor, G Lawrence, Y Friedlander, D S Siscovick, H Hochner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Conceptual and analytical approaches for modelling the developmental origins of inequality.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

B SavitskyThe Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel. savitskyb@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8917-8419
O ManorThe Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
G LawrenceThe Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Y FriedlanderThe Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
D S SiscovickNew York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
H HochnerThe Braun School of Public Health, The Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILAshkelon Academic College · ILNew York Academy of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccording to the hypothesis of Gluckman and Hanson, mismatch between the developmental and postdevelopmental environments may lead to detrimental health impacts such as obesity. While several animal studies support the mismatch theory, there is a scarcity of evidence from human-based studies.

objectivesOur study aims to examine whether a mismatch between the developmental and young-adult environments affect obesity in young adults of the Jerusalem Perinatal Family Follow-Up Study.

methodsData from The Jerusalem Perinatal Family Follow-Up Study birth cohort was used to characterize early and late environments using offspring and parental sociodemographic and lifestyle information at birth, age 32 (n = 1140) and 42 (n = 404). Scores characterizing the early and late environments were constructed using factor analysis. To assess associations of mismatch with obesity, regression models were fitted using the first factor of each environment and adiposity measures at age 32 and 42.

resultsHaving a stable non-beneficial environment at birth and young-adulthood was most strongly associated with increased adiposity, while a stable beneficial environment was most favorable. The transition from a beneficial environment at birth to a less beneficial environment at young-adulthood was associated with higher obesity measures, including higher BMI (β = 0.979; 95% CI: 0.029, 1.929), waist circumference (β = 2.729; 95% CI: 0.317, 5.140) and waist-hip ratio (β = 0.017; 95% CI: 0.004, 0.029) compared with those experiencing a beneficial environment at both time points. Transition from a less beneficial environment at birth to a beneficial environment at adulthood was also associated with higher obesity measurements (BMI -β = 1.116; 95% CI: 0.085, 2.148; waist circumference -β = 2.736; 95% CI: 0.215, 5.256).

conclusionsThis study provides some support for the mismatch hypothesis. While there is indication that an accumulation of the effects of the non-beneficial environment has the strongest detrimental impact on obesity outcomes, our results also indicate that a mismatch between the developmental and later environments may result in maladaptation of the individual leading to obesity.

Indexed as

Social EnvironmentAdultBiological EvolutionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornIsraelMaleObesityParents

Identifiers

PMID33762678
OpenAlexW3137791440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.