Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762647›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Significant impact of circulating tumour DNA mutations on survival in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Axel Muendlein, Kathrin Geiger, Stella Gaenger, Tobias Dechow, Christoph Nonnenbroich, Andreas Leiherer, Heinz Drexel, Andreas Gaumann, Wolfgang Jagla, Thomas Winder and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vaccines targetingHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Field cancerization in breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Axel MuendleinMolecular Biology Laboratory, Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria. axel.muendlein@vivit.at.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-4125
Kathrin GeigerMolecular Biology Laboratory, Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria.
Stella GaengerMolecular Biology Laboratory, Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria.
Tobias DechowOnkologie Ravensburg, 88212, Ravensburg, Germany.
Christoph NonnenbroichOnkologie Ravensburg, 88212, Ravensburg, Germany.
Andreas LeihererMolecular Biology Laboratory, Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria.
Heinz DrexelMolecular Biology Laboratory, Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment, Stadtstraße 33, 6850, Dornbirn, Austria.
Andreas GaumannInstitute of Pathology Kaufbeuren-Ravensburg, 87600, Kaufbeuren, Germany.
Wolfgang JaglaInstitute of Pathology Kaufbeuren-Ravensburg, 87600, Kaufbeuren, Germany.
Thomas WinderDepartment of Haematology and Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800, Feldkirch, Austria.
Frank MayerPraxis und Tagesklinik, Prof. Dr. Oettle Helmut und Prof. Dr. Dr. Mayer Frank, 88045, Friedrichshafen, Germany.
Thomas DeckerOnkologie Ravensburg, 88212, Ravensburg, Germany.
Vorarlberg Institute for Vascular Investigation and Treatment · ATRavensburg University of Cooperative Education · DESensor-Technik Wiedemann (Germany) · DEIVF Centers Prof. Zech · ATLandeskrankenhaus Feldkirch · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutational analysis of circulating tumour (ct) DNA holds promise as an effective tool to predict the course of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In the present study we used targeted next generation sequencing of ctDNA to evaluate the impact of cancer driven mutations on the prognosis of MBC. The study included 59 oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative MBC patients. Sequencing analysis was performed in ESR1, PIK3CA, ERBB2, PTEN, TP53, KRAS, HRAS, NRAS, and AR. At baseline, patients started receiving either chemotherapy (34%; n = 20) or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor therapy in combination with endocrine therapy (CDK4/6i+ET; 66%; n = 39). Overall, 64.4% (n = 38) of the patients carried at least one pathogenic or likely-pathogenic mutation. Number of ctDNA mutations was significantly linked with worse progression free survival (PFS; p = 0.003) and overall survival (OS; p = 0.007). Furthermore, ctDNA load, defined by the number of mutant ctDNA molecules per mL plasma, significantly correlated with PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.001). Furthermore, mutational status of ESR1 and TP53 significantly predicted PFS (p = 0.024 and p = 0.035, respectively) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.035, respectively). These results emphasizes the clinical value of ctDNA mutational analysis in the management of advanced breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiquid BiopsyMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNA

Identifiers

PMID33762647
PMCPMC7990915
OpenAlexW3137996554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.