Trial reportScientific reports2021
A randomized clinical trial of dentin hypersensitivity reduction over one month after a single topical application of comparable materials.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04351412 (Comparison of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over a 1-month Period Between a Single Topical Application of a Dentin-desensitizing Agent), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Dentin Hypersensitivity Reduction Over a 1-month Period Between a Single Topical Application of a Dentin-desensitizing Agent (Gluma) and Other Materials: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical effectiveness of theobromine, Remin Pro, and their combination in managing dentin hypersensitivity: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Comparative evaluation of Giomer varnish versus fluoride varnish as desensitizing agents among a group of children with molar incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Effect of different material protocols on the control of dentin hypersensitivity: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Trial
- Er:YAG laser therapy in combination with GLUMA desensitizer reduces dentin hypersensitivity in children with molar-incisor hypomineralization: a randomized clinical trial.Lasers in medical science · 2023Trial
- Dentin hypersensitivity, an enigma revisited: Mechanisms, diagnosis and therapeutic advances.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Review
- Effect of Glutaraldehyde-Based Desensitizer on Control of Tooth Sensitivity and Tooth Color Post-bleaching: A Randomized Clinical Trial.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Efficacy and Durability of Two Desensitizing Agents on Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: An In Vitro Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Diode, Nd:YAG and Er:YAG Lasers Accompanied by Fluoride in Dentinal Tubule Obstruction.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2021Article
- Comparative Study on the Efficacy of OliNano Seal and Curodont D'Senz in the Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity (Clinical Trial andJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
- Efficacy of advanced treatment modalities of dentin hypersensitivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
- ISP Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for the management of Dentin Hypersensitivity.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
- Little Ironweed and Java Tea in Herbal Toothpaste Reduced Dentine Permeability: AnJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) is a condition that causes patient discomfort. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Gluma, fluoride varnish and Tetric N-Bond self-etch system in relieving DH immediately and over 30 days following a single topical application. The present randomized clinical trial was conducted on 55 patients with an age range 20-49 years. 70 teeth in total were incorporated and randomly assigned to the three groups. Parameters examined were: Tactile, air blast, and cold stimuli. VAS was used to assess tactile stimulus whereas the Schiff Cold Scale for air blast and cold stimuli. DH was evaluated immediately, at two weeks and 1 month follow up. Gluma showed a statistically significant reduction in DH scores over other materials. It was concluded that Gluma have statistically significant results over other materials in relieving DH immediately and over 30 days following a single topical application.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04351412, King Abdulaziz University Protocol Record 129-09-19. Registered 17 April 2020 - Retrospectively registered. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04351412 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.