Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762589›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Non-contrast dual-energy CT virtual ischemia maps accurately estimate ischemic core size in large-vessel occlusive stroke.

Dylan N Wolman, Fasco van Ommen, Elizabeth Tong, Frans Kauw, Jan Willem Dankbaar, Edwin Bennink, Hugo W A M de Jong, Lior Molvin, Max Wintermark, Jeremy J Heit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Automated estimation of ischemic core volume on noncontrast-enhanced CT via machine learning.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dylan N WolmanDepartment of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room S-047, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. dwolman1@stanford.edu.
Fasco van OmmenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elizabeth TongDepartment of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room S-047, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Frans KauwDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem DankbaarDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edwin BenninkDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hugo W A M de JongDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lior MolvinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room S-047, Stanford, CA, 94505, USA.
Max WintermarkDepartment of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room S-047, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Jeremy J HeitDepartment of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention, Stanford University Hospital, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room S-047, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. jheit@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual-energy CT (DECT) material decomposition techniques may better detect edema within cerebral infarcts than conventional non-contrast CT (NCCT). This study compared if Virtual Ischemia Maps (VIM) derived from non-contrast DECT of patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) are superior to NCCT for ischemic core estimation, compared against reference-standard DWI-MRI. Only patients whose baseline ischemic core was most likely to remain stable on follow-up MRI were included, defined as those with excellent post-thrombectomy revascularization or no perfusion mismatch. Twenty-four consecutive AIS-LVO patients with baseline non-contrast DECT, CT perfusion (CTP), and DWI-MRI were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was agreement between volumetric manually segmented VIM, NCCT, and automatically segmented CTP estimates of the ischemic core relative to manually segmented DWI volumes. Volume agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and comparison of CT to DWI volume ratios. DWI volumes were better approximated by VIM than NCCT (VIM/DWI ratio 0.68 ± 0.35 vs. NCCT/DWI ratio 0.34 ± 0.35; P < 0.001) or CTP (CTP/DWI ratio 0.45 ± 0.67; P < 0.001), and VIM best correlated with DWI (r

Indexed as

AgedBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPerfusion ImagingStrokeThrombectomyTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID33762589
PMCPMC7991428
OpenAlexW3137765691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.