Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762575›Full record

ArticleBDJ open2021

Dental periodontal procedures: a systematic review of contamination (splatter, droplets and aerosol) in relation to COVID-19.

Ilona G Johnson, Rhiannon J Jones, Jennifer E Gallagher, William G Wade, Waraf Al-Yaseen, Mark Robertson, Scott McGregor, Sukriti K C, Nicola Innes, Rebecca Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BDJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ilona G JohnsonCardiff University School of Dentistry, Applied Clinical Research and Public Health, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK. JohnsonIG@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9712-2693
Rhiannon J JonesCardiff University School of Dentistry, Dental Education, Scholarship & Innovation, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6771-7669
Jennifer E GallagherFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5068-8008
William G WadeKing's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2685-826X
Waraf Al-YaseenSchool of Dentistry, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7071-5074
Mark RobertsonSchool of Dentistry, Child Dental and Oral Health, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-3044
Scott McGregorLibrary and Learning Centre, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-5368
Sukriti K CFaculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Surgery, King's College London, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Denmark Hill Campus, Bessemer Road, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3525-3908
Nicola InnesSchool of Dentistry, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9984-0012
Rebecca HarrisDepartment of Public Health, Policy & Systems, University of Liverpool, Room 124, 1st Floor, Block B, Waterhouse Building, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5891-6826
Cardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and subsequent COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant effect on the delivery of routine dentistry; and in particular, periodontal care across the world. This systematic review examines the literature relating to splatter, droplet settle and aerosol for periodontal procedures and forms part of a wider body of research to understand the risk of contamination in relation to periodontal care procedures relevant to COVID-19.

methodsA search of the literature was carried out using key terms and MeSH words relating to the review questions. Sources included Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS, ClinicalTrials.Gov . Studies meeting inclusion criteria were screened in duplicate and data extraction was carried out using a template. All studies were assessed for methodological quality and sensitivity. Narrative synthesis was undertaken.

resultsFifty studies were included in the review with procedures including ultrasonic scaling (n = 44), air polishing (n = 4), prophylaxis (n = 2) and hand scaling (n = 3). Outcomes included bacterial (colony-forming units e.g. on settle plates) or blood contamination (e.g. visible splatter) and non bacterial, non blood (e.g. chemiluminescence or coloured dyes) contamination. All studies found contamination at all sites although the contamination associated with hand scaling was very low. Contamination was identified in all of the studies even where suction was used at baseline. Higher power settings created greater contamination. Distribution of contamination varied in relation to operator position and was found on the operator, patient and assistant with higher levels around the head of the operator and the mouth and chest of the patient. Settle was identified 30 min after treatments had finished but returned to background levels when measured at or after an hour. The evidence was generally low to medium quality and likely to underestimate contamination.

conclusionUltrasonic scaling, air polishing and prophylaxis procedures produce contamination (splatter, droplets and aerosol) in the presence of suction, with a small amount of evidence showing droplets taking between 30 min and 1 h to settle. Consideration should be given to infection control, areas of cleaning particularly around the patient and appropriate personal protective equipment, with particular attention to respiratory, facial and body protection for these procedures. In addition, the use of lower power settings should be considered to reduce the amount and spread of contamination.

Identifiers

PMID33762575
PMCPMC7988384
OpenAlexW3137195738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.