Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762430›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

No evidence that collective-good appeals best promote COVID-related health behaviors.

Nathaniel Rabb, David Glick, Attiyya Houston, Jake Bowers, David Yokum

Abstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prosocial nudges and visual indicators increase social distancing, but authoritative nudges do not.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. The influence of social norms varies with "others" groups: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination intentions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The effect of herd immunity thresholds on willingness to vaccinate.Humanities & social sciences communications · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Reply to Rabb et al.: Why promoting COVID-19 vaccines with community immunity is not a good strategy (yet).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathaniel RabbThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903; natrabb@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7283-2549
David GlickThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903.
Attiyya HoustonThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903.
Jake BowersThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903.ORCID 0000-0002-4048-1166
David YokumThe Policy Lab, Brown University, Providence, RI 02903.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health BehaviorPersuasive CommunicationHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33762430
PMCPMC8040659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.