Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762244›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation alone and in combination with motor control exercise for the treatment of individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (ExTraStim trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Philippe Patricio, Jean-Sébastien Roy, Luciana Macedo, Mathieu Roy, Guillaume Léonard, Paul Hodges, Hugo Massé-Alarie

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04555278 nacompletednot on this map

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Alone and in Combination With Motor Control Exercise for the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain (ExTraStim Trial): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHugo Massé-AlarieRan2020 to 2024Enrolled140ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsActive rTMS, Sham rTMS, Motor Control Exercises
NCT05961774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Investigation of Underlying Mechanism of Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Activation Deficits in Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMahidol UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsLow Back PainArmsTranscranial magnetic stimulation, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philippe PatricioFaculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-8061
Jean-Sébastien RoyCIRRIS, Quebec, Quebec, Canada.
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1840-2951
Mathieu RoyDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Guillaume LéonardUniversite de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Paul HodgesThe University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Hugo Massé-AlarieFaculté de médecine, Université Laval, Quebec, Quebec, Canada hugo.masse-alarie@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Funding

CIHR 169993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile multiple pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions treating chronic non-specific low back pain (CLBP) are available, they have been shown to produce at best modest effects. Interventions such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, have exhibited promising results to alleviate chronic pain. However, evidence on the effectiveness of rTMS for CLBP is scarce due to limited rigorous clinical trials. Combining rTMS with motor control exercises (MCE) may help to address both central and nociceptive factors contributing to the persistence of LBP. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the effectiveness of a combination of rTMS and MCE to repeated rTMS sessions alone, sham rTMS and a combination of sham rTMS and MCE on pain intensity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One hundred and forty participants (35/group) with CLBP will be randomised into four groups (active rTMS+MCE, sham rTMS+MCE, active rTMS and sham rTMS) to receive 10 sessions of their allocated intervention. The primary outcome will be the pain intensity, assessed at baseline, 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes will include disability, fear of movement, quality of life and patient global rating of change. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04555278.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLow Back PainExerciseHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTranscranial Magnetic StimulationTreatment Outcomeback painpain managementrehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID33762244
PMCPMC7993312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.