Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762217›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Hybrid hyperalignment: A single high-dimensional model of shared information embedded in cortical patterns of response and functional connectivity.

Erica L Busch, Lukas Slipski, Ma Feilong, J Swaroop Guntupalli, Matteo Visconti di Oleggio Castello, Jeremy F Huckins, Samuel A Nastase, M Ida Gobbini, Tor D Wager, James V Haxby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spurious correlations in surface-based functional brain imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dissociation of Reliability, Heritability, and Predictivity in Coarse- and Fine-Scale Functional Connectomes during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Erica L BuschDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: Erica.Busch@yale.edu.
Lukas SlipskiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: Lukas.Slipski.gr@dartmouth.edu.
Ma FeilongDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
J Swaroop GuntupalliVicarious AI, Union City, CA, USA.
Matteo Visconti di Oleggio CastelloHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Jeremy F HuckinsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Samuel A NastasePrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
M Ida GobbiniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Medical School, University of Bologna, Italy; Cognitive Science Program, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Tor D WagerDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
James V HaxbyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: James.V.Haxby@dartmouth.edu.

Funding

SOCIAL EFFECTS OF THREATS TO SELFR01MH059282 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI HAXBY, JAMES V · 2001 to 2020
$6.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared information content is represented across brains in idiosyncratic functional topographies. Hyperalignment addresses these idiosyncrasies by using neural responses to project individuals' brain data into a common model space while maintaining the geometric relationships between distinct patterns of activity or connectivity. The dimensions of this common model capture functional profiles that are shared across individuals such as cortical response profiles collected during a common time-locked stimulus presentation (e.g. movie viewing) or functional connectivity profiles. Hyperalignment can use either response-based or connectivity-based input data to derive transformations that project individuals' neural data from anatomical space into the common model space. Previously, only response or connectivity profiles were used in the derivation of these transformations. In this study, we developed a new hyperalignment algorithm, hybrid hyperalignment, that derives transformations based on both response-based and connectivity-based information. We used three different movie-viewing fMRI datasets to test the performance of our new algorithm. Hybrid hyperalignment derives a single common model space that aligns response-based information as well as or better than response hyperalignment while simultaneously aligning connectivity-based information better than connectivity hyperalignment. These results suggest that a single common information space can encode both shared cortical response and functional connectivity profiles across individuals.

Indexed as

Motion PicturesAdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPhotic StimulationfMRIFunctional alignmentFunctional connectivityHyperalignmentNaturalistic stimuli

Identifiers

PMID33762217
PMCPMC8273921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.