Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762214›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

How expectations of pain elicited by consciously and unconsciously perceived cues unfold over time.

Yiheng Tu, Dimitrios Pantazis, Georgia Wilson, Sheraz Khan, Seppo Ahlfors, Jian Kong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yiheng TuDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Dimitrios PantazisDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; McGovern Institute of Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Georgia WilsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Sheraz KhanAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Seppo AhlforsAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Jian KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA. Electronic address: kongj@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · US

Funding

Neural dynamics of directly and indirectly conditioned placebo/nocebo effectR21AT008707 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KONG, JIAN · 2016 to 2017
$479k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT008707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expectation can shape the perception of pain within a fraction of time, but little is known about how perceived expectation unfolds over time and modulates pain perception. Here, we combine magnetoencephalography (MEG) and machine learning approaches to track the neural dynamics of expectations of pain in healthy participants with both sexes. We found that the expectation of pain, as conditioned by facial cues, can be decoded from MEG as early as 150 ms and up to 1100 ms after cue onset, but decoding expectation elicited by unconsciously perceived cues requires more time and decays faster compared to consciously perceived ones. Also, results from temporal generalization suggest that neural dynamics of decoding cue-based expectation were predominately sustained during cue presentation but transient after cue presentation. Finally, although decoding expectation elicited by consciously perceived cues were based on a series of time-restricted brain regions during cue presentation, decoding relied on the medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex after cue presentation for both consciously and unconsciously perceived cues. These findings reveal the conscious and unconscious processing of expectation during pain anticipation and may shed light on enhancing clinical care by demonstrating the impact of expectation cues.

Indexed as

CuesUnconscious, PsychologyAdultAnticipation, PsychologicalConditioning, PsychologicalConsciousnessFacial RecognitionFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMachine LearningMagnetoencephalographyMaleNociceptive PainPain PerceptionPrefrontal CortexConditioningConscious and unconsciousExpectation of painMachine learningNeural dynamicsTemporal decodingTemporal generalization

Identifiers

PMID33762214
PMCPMC8248481
OpenAlexW3138814212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.