Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762145›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2021

Fostering MOUD use in justice populations: Assessing the comparative effectiveness of two favored implementation strategies to increase MOUD use.

Todd Molfenter, Jessica Vechinski, Faye S Taxman, Alex J Breno, Cameron C Shaw, Heather A Perez

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05853289 (Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05853289 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Piloting a Web-Based Implementation Resource for Pregnancy Opioid Use Disorder Care in Jail

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled22ConditionsOpioid Use DisorderArmsMaternal Opioid use Disorder Management and Care Resources (MOM CARE) in Custody
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Todd MolfenterUniversity of Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jessica VechinskiUniversity of Wisconsin, United States of America. Electronic address: jvechinski@wisc.edu.
Faye S TaxmanGeorge Mason University, United States of America.
Alex J BrenoGeorge Mason University, United States of America.
Cameron C ShawGeorge Mason University, United States of America.
Heather A PerezMichigan State University, United States of America.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Technical Assistance CoreU2CDA050097 · NIDA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI Jessica Hulsey Nickel · 2019 to 2026
$37.0M
HEAL Accelerator: Leveraging Partnerships and Targeted Dissemination to Advance UptakeOT2OD034479 · OD · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI TAXMAN, FAYE S · 2022 to 2023
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050097NIH HHS OT2 OD034479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coaching is a favored strategy for the implementation of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), yet research has not adequately tested or assessed coaching dosages and mediums for overall effectiveness, nor have coaching doses been widely studied within criminal justice settings (CJS). Scaling up the use of MOUD, particularly in CJS, presents a challenge given the stigmatization of substance use disorder, funding for MOUD, availability and capacity of community-based treatment providers, leadership support, and the historical preference for behavioral therapy-based treatment practices. The University of Wisconsin's Center for Health Enhancement and Systems Studies (CHESS) and George Mason University's Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence! (ACE!) are conducting a randomized controlled trial to determine the optimal combination and dosages for two different coaching strategies to disseminate MOUD in justice-involved populations; those strategies are the NIATx model for process improvement and Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) model. NIATx coaches provide technical assistance in MOUD implementation and organizational change to help justice and treatment organizations to implement and disseminate MOUD for justice clients. The ECHO platform focuses primarily on the clinical provider by connecting the provider with expert MOUD prescribers to promote high-quality MOUD practices. The trial will have four study arms that compare high-dose and low-dose coaching, with and without ECHO. This will be the first trial that assesses the comparative effectiveness of two types of coaching methods at varying dosages for justice-involved individuals. The trial will be conducted with 48 jails and community-based treatment provider sites that handle justice-involved persons with opioid use disorder (OUD).

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersBehavior TherapyCriminal LawHealth ServicesHumansCoachingCommunity providersImplementationJailMATMOUD

Identifiers

PMID33762145
PMCPMC8384644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.