Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33762046›Full record

ArticleBJPsych bulletin2021

Perspectives of GCSE students attending a psychiatry summer school in south London.

Clementine Wyke, Glori-Louise de Bernier, Chun Chiang Sin Fai Lam, Clare Holt, Sophie Butler, Anto Praveen Rajkumar Rajamani, Charlotte Wilson Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych bulletin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Clementine WykeSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-5997
Glori-Louise de BernierSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Chun Chiang Sin Fai LamSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Clare HoltSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Sophie ButlerSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Anto Praveen Rajkumar RajamaniUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
Charlotte Wilson JonesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

methodThis study evaluated a pilot psychiatry summer school for GCSE students in terms of participant experience, effects on attitudes to mental illness and perception of psychiatry as a career option. This was done using the Community Attitudes towards the Mentally Ill scale, career choice questionnaires and a discussion group following the week-long programme attended by 26 students.

resultsStudents were significantly more likely to choose psychiatry after the summer school (P = 0.01). There were statistically significant changes in scores for social restrictiveness (P = 0.04) and community mental health ideology (P = 0.02). Qualitative analysis generated four themes: variation in expectations, limited prior knowledge, perception of the summer school itself and uniformly positive attitudes to psychiatry after the summer school. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Targeting students at this early stage appears to be an underexplored positive intervention for improving both attitudes towards mental illness and recruitment to psychiatry.

Indexed as

Education and trainingrecruitmentschool studentsstigma and discriminationsummer school

Identifiers

PMID33762046
PMCPMC8112016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.