Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33761971›Full record

ReviewClinical epigenetics2021

Tackling tumor microenvironment through epigenetic tools to improve cancer immunotherapy.

Iris Lodewijk, Sandra P Nunes, Rui Henrique, Carmen Jerónimo, Marta Dueñas, Jesús M Paramio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical epigenetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Acetylation of Histone H3 in Cancer Progression and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Iris Lodewijk *Molecular Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales Y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Sandra P Nunes *Molecular Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales Y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Rui HenriqueCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group - Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Carmen JerónimoCancer Biology and Epigenetics Group - Research Center, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (CI-IPOP), 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Marta DueñasMolecular Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales Y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús M ParamioMolecular Oncology Unit, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales Y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), 28040, Madrid, Spain. jesusm.paramio@ciemat.es.ORCID 0000-0001-7520-3177
Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversidade do Porto · PT

Funding

European Regional Development Fund PID2019-110758RB-I00European Regional Development Fund SAF2015-66015-RFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/ 144241/2019Instituto de Salud Carlos III CB16/12/00228Instituto de Salud Carlos III DTS20/00043Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00813Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização PO-CI-01-0145-FEDER-29030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpigenetic alterations are known contributors to cancer development and aggressiveness. Additional to alterations in cancer cells, aberrant epigenetic marks are present in cells of the tumor microenvironment, including lymphocytes and tumor-associated macrophages, which are often overlooked but known to be a contributing factor to a favorable environment for tumor growth. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to give an overview of the epigenetic alterations affecting immune cells in the tumor microenvironment to provoke an immunosuppressive function and contribute to cancer development. Moreover, immunotherapy is briefly discussed in the context of epigenetics, describing both its combination with epigenetic drugs and the need for epigenetic biomarkers to predict response to immune checkpoint blockage. MAIN BODY: Combining both topics, epigenetic machinery plays a central role in generating an immunosuppressive environment for cancer growth, which creates a barrier for immunotherapy to be successful. Furthermore, epigenetic-directed compounds may not only affect cancer cells but also immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, which could be beneficial for the clinical response to immunotherapy.

conclusionThus, modulating epigenetics in combination with immunotherapy might be a promising therapeutic option to improve the success of this therapy. Further studies are necessary to (1) understand in depth the impact of the epigenetic machinery in the tumor microenvironment; (2) how the epigenetic machinery can be modulated according to tumor type to increase response to immunotherapy and (3) find reliable biomarkers for a better selection of patients eligible to immunotherapy.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsTumor MicroenvironmentBladder cancerEpigeneticsImmunotherapyTherapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33761971
PMCPMC7992805
OpenAlexW3118445287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.