ArticleBMC health services research2021
Exploring the barriers and facilitators of psychological safety in primary care teams: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential elements and outcomes of psychological safety in the healthcare practice setting: A systematic review.Applied nursing research : ANR · 2025Pooled it
- Designing Nurse-Physician Collaboration to Improve Psychological Safety, Satisfaction and Commitment of Critical Care Nurses-A Multi-Informant Survey Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Teamwork and relational infrastructure: a qualitative study of modern UK general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- Empathy as an Essential Skill of Interprofessional Collaboration in Healthcare: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Let's Talk About the Elephant in the Room: A Psychological Safety Climate Intervention Among Nursing Teams-A Qualitative Evaluation.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Team-based care in small primary care practices: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Psychological Safety in Surgical Training.Cureus · 2026Article
- Expatriate Nurses' Experiences of Psychological Safety and Cultural Adaptation in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: A Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- An Umbrella Review of Relational Enablers of Psychological Safety and Identity-Related Gaps in the Evidence: Implications for Healthcare and Organizational Settings.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Review
- Green Voice Behavior in Nursing: The Roles of Organizational Support, Intrinsic Motivation, and Psychological Safety.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Putting patients first: how risk awareness drives action among healthcare professionals in Slovakia.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Balancing act-ethnic minority trainees' coping strategies in Dutch GP-specialty training-a qualitative study.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Psychological safety and primary care physicians' well-being, work conditions and guideline adherence behavior: a cross-sectional study in China.Global health action · 2025Article
- Enhancing learning from evaluations in newborn and child health.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Health and Social Care Professionals' Experience of Psychological Safety Within Their Occupational Setting: A Thematic Synthesis Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- 'I Think the First Priority is Physically Safe First, Before You Can Actually Get Psychologically Safe': Staff Perspectives on Psychological Safety in Inpatient Mental Health Settings.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2025Article
- Getting ON-TRAC, a team-centred design study of a reflexivity aid to support resuscitation teams' information sharing.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2025Article
- Psychological safety mediates attendance and recovery-related outcomes within the Phoenix: a sober-active community.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Psychological safety in the perioperative environment: a cost-consequence analysis.BMJ leader · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychological safety is the concept by which individuals feel comfortable expressing themselves in a work environment, without fear of embarrassment or criticism from others. Psychological safety in healthcare is associated with improved patient safety outcomes, enhanced physician engagement and fostering a creative learning environment. Therefore, it is important to establish the key levers which can act as facilitators or barriers to establishing psychological safety. Existing literature on psychological safety in healthcare teams has focused on secondary care, primarily from an individual profession perspective. In light of the increased focus on multidisciplinary work in primary care and the need for team-based studies, given that psychological safety is a team-based construct, this study sought to investigate the facilitators and barriers to psychological safety in primary care multidisciplinary teams.
methodsA mono-method qualitative research design was chosen for this study. Healthcare professionals from four primary care teams (n = 20) were recruited using snowball sampling. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to generate findings.
resultsThree meta themes surfaced: shared beliefs, facilitators and barriers to psychological safety. The shared beliefs offered insights into the teams' background functioning, providing important context to the facilitators and barriers of psychological safety specific to each team. Four barriers to psychological safety were identified: hierarchy, perceived lack of knowledge, personality and authoritarian leadership. Eight facilitators surfaced: leader and leader inclusiveness, open culture, vocal personality, support in silos, boundary spanner, chairing meetings, strong interpersonal relationships and small groups.
conclusionThis study emphasises that factors influencing psychological safety can be individualistic, team-based or organisational. Although previous literature has largely focused on the role of leaders in promoting psychological safety, safe environments can be created by all team members. Members can facilitate psychological safety in instances where positive leadership behaviours are lacking - for example, strengthening interpersonal relationships, finding support in silos or rotating the chairperson in team meetings. It is anticipated that these findings will encourage practices to reflect on their team dynamics and adopt strategies to ensure every member's voice is heard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.