Article in The Clinical neuropsychologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Crystal G Guayara-QuinnDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Caroline O NesterDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Mindy J KatzSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
David M TurbevilleDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College of The City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Andrew J SaykinDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Center for Neuroimaging and Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Richard B LiptonSaul R. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Laura A RabinDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center of The City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Albert Einstein College of Medicine · USCity University of New York · USBrooklyn College · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USQueens College, CUNY · US
Funding
Vascular Structure and Function in Cognitive AgingP01AG003949 · NIA · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTOPHER G ENGELAND · 1985 to 2026
$73.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072976 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI ANDREW J SAYKIN · 2021 to 2026
$24.1M
Memory Circuitry in MCI and Early Alzheimer’s Disease Prodrome: Molecular DriversR01AG019771 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 2001 to 2021
$6.9M
Stress, Unconstructive Repetitive Thought and Cognitive AgingR01AG039409 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SLIWINSKI, MARTIN J · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Novel Multimodal Assessment of Practical Judgment Across the Alzheimer's Continuum: Toward a Better Understanding of how to Predict Risk in the ElderlyR15AG066039 · NIA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI RABIN, LAURA A. · 2020 to 2023
$522k
Correction of Bias in Estimating Risk of AD and Cognitive and Mobile Decline Using Auxiliary InformationR21AG056920 · NIA · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI WANG, CUILING · 2017 to 2018
$459k
Cognitive Complaints in a Diverse Cohort of Elders: Novel Assessment ApproachesSC2AG039235 · NIA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI RABIN, LAURA A. · 2010 to 2012
$459k
Improving the assessment of judgment ability in older adults with preclinical and clinical dementiaF31AG063472 · NIA · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI QUINN, CRYSTAL GLORIA · 2019 to 2020
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Re-evaluation of psychometric evidence and update of normative data for the Test of Practical Judgment. · full record | OpenQuestion