Opportunities for public involvement in big data research in palliative and end-of-life care.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Co-producing data-intensive research with an underserved group: a case study and evaluation identifying pathways to impact.International journal of population data science · 2025
   Article
2. A review of reviews exploring patient and public involvement in population health research and development of tools containing best practice guidance.BMC public health · 2023
   Review
3. Hotspot Mining in the Field of Library and Information Science under the Environment of Big Data.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022
   Article
4. Data science research in sub-Saharan Africa: Ethical considerations in crowdsourcing for community engagement.South African journal of science
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as