ArticleMedicine2021
Effectiveness and safety review of Chinese herbal sachets for external use in the treatment of COVID-19 pandemic: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 has strong transmission power, and people are generally susceptible to it. Patients with weak constitution and low immunity function are more likely to be infected. Aromatic therapy of traditional Chinese medicine has the effect of inhibiting virus and sterilization, especially the external treatment of traditional Chinese medicine has played an important role in the fight against the epidemic situation.
methodsNine databases will be searched under the guideline of research strategy, from their inception to March 31, 2021, for relevant randomized controlled trial (RCTs) published. These databases are Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-fang Data, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. The types on Language of literature are English and Chinese. Researchers will independently operate the literature research, screening, quality evaluation, data collection, and data analysis with same research strategy and selection criteria. Methodological quality will be evaluated under the guideline of the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) will be used to determine confidence in the effect estimates. Meta-analysis or subgroup analysis will be performed according to the including data type. Meta-analysis will be performed with Stata 13.0 software.
resultsOutcome will be displayed by effective rates, quality of life score, adverse effect.
conclusionThis systematic review will provide evidence whether Chinese herbal sachets are effective and safe intervention of COVID-19 Pandemic. REGISTRATION NUMBER IN PROSPERO: CRD42021238580.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.